MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3191100278 · doi:10.1016/j.jdin.2021.06.001

Two-year efficacy, safety, and drug survival of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis: A real-world Canadian multicenter retrospective study

2021· article· en· W3191100278 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAD International · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDermatology and Skin Diseases
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences CentreProbity Medical ResearchSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of OttawaWomen's College HospitalPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDupilumabAtopic dermatitisMedicineDiscontinuationRetrospective cohort studyCohortEczema Area and Severity IndexDermatologyObservational studyCohort studyInternal medicinePediatrics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Limited studies are available on the long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) beyond the 52-week follow-up. A recent publication by our group showed favorable efficacy outcomes with no new safety signals in patients with AD over 52-weeks of dupilumab treatment.1Jo C.E. Georgakopoulos J.R. Ladda M. et al.Evaluation of long-term efficacy, safety, and reasons for discontinuation of dupilumab for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in clinical practice: a retrospective cohort study.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 82: 1530-1532Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar An observational prospective cohort study of the TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic eczema, the Netherlands) registry showed consistent safety and efficacy outcomes up to week 84.2Bosma A.L. de Wijs L.E.M. Hof M.H. et al.Long-term effectiveness and safety of treatment with dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: results of the TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic eczema, the Netherlands) registry.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 83: 1375-1384Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Herein, we aimed to assess the 2-year drug survival of dupilumab in real-world patients with AD. Following research ethics board approval, we conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of all consecutive adult patients (aged ≥18 years) receiving treatment with dupilumab at 3 tertiary academic dermatology clinics in Toronto. Cases were included if they had moderate-to-severe AD (Investigator Global Assessment [IGA] 3 or 4) at baseline and seen 104 weeks after dupilumab initiation while on therapy. Drug survival was analyzed using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to estimate the risk of and time to discontinuation. Patients were censored if their reason to stop dupilumab treatment was unrelated to efficacy or safety (eg, loss of insurance coverage). We included 145 patients. The mean (±SD) age was 44.5 ± 14.8 years, and 74 patients (51%) were female. Comorbid conditions included asthma (n = 97; 48.3%), allergic rhinitis (n = 38; 26.2%), and urticaria (n = 15; 10.3%). Patients had failed a median of 2 (range, 0-6) systemic therapies prior to dupilumab. In total, 85 of 145 patients (59%), 83 of 143 (58%), and 94 of 139 (68%) achieved IGA 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) at 16, 52, and 104 weeks, respectively. Of the 83 patients with IGA 0/1 at 52 weeks, 74 (89%) maintained IGA 0/1 at 104 weeks. Of the 60 patients with IGA >1 at 52 weeks, 20 (33%) achieved IGA 0/1 at 104 weeks. In the entire cohort, 89 of 145 patients (61%) reported 1 or more adverse events (AEs) at any point throughout the study period (Table I). New or persistent AEs were reported by 64 of 145 patients (44%), 48 of 143 (34%), and 31 of 139 (22%) between 0 and 16, 16 and 52, and 52 and 104 weeks, respectively. Ocular surface disease was the most commonly reported AE between 52 and 104 weeks (18 of 139 patients; 13%). Drug survival of dupilumab was 97%, 83%, and 80% after 16, 52, and 104 weeks, respectively (Fig 1). Discontinuation of dupilumab treatment was most common between 16 and 52 weeks (20 of 143 patients; 14%) compared with that between 52 and 104 (9 of 139 patients; 6%) and 0 and 16 weeks (5 of 145 patients; 3%) (Table I).Table IReported adverse events and dupilumab discontinuation based on follow-up timeVariableFollow-up periods0-16 weeks (N = 145)16-52 weeks (N = 143)52-104 weeks (N = 139)One or more adverse event, n (%)64 (44)48 (34)31 (22)Reported adverse events, n (%) Ocular surface disease45 (31)36 (25)18 (13) Infections8 (6)3 (2)4 (3)Oral herpes6 (4)1 (1)2 (1)Cellulitis2 (1)1 (1)1 (1)Cystitis1 (1)1 (1)0Flu-like symptoms1 (1)2 (1)0Upper respiratory tract infection001 (1) Skin disordersInjection site reaction6 (4)2 (1)2 (1)Head and neck eczema flare or redness2 (1)4 (3)7 (5)Urticaria1 (1)2 (1)2 (1) Asthma flare1 (1)00 MusculoskeletalFatigue1 (1)00Arthralgia2 (1)3 (2)0 Headache000 Gastrointestinal symptoms4 (3)2 (1)0 Generalized nonspecific symptoms∗Nonspecific symptoms include episodes of dizziness, lightheadedness, blurred vision, and/or sweating.4 (3)2 (1)0Dupilumab discontinuation, n (%)†Patients who discontinued dupilumab due to an adverse event or lack of efficacy were carried forward and included as Investigator Global Assessment nonresponders for each timepoint. Discontinuation due to non–drug-related reasons was excluded from Investigator Global Assessment analysis.5 (3)20 (14)9 (6) Secondary to adverse event4 (3)6 (4)4 (3) Due to lack of efficacy1 (1)12 (8)1 (1) Non–drug-related reason‡Non–drug-related reasons include pregnancy, travel, and loss of insurance drug coverage.02 (1)4 (3)n, Number of subjects meeting criteria.∗ Nonspecific symptoms include episodes of dizziness, lightheadedness, blurred vision, and/or sweating.† Patients who discontinued dupilumab due to an adverse event or lack of efficacy were carried forward and included as Investigator Global Assessment nonresponders for each timepoint. Discontinuation due to non–drug-related reasons was excluded from Investigator Global Assessment analysis.‡ Non–drug-related reasons include pregnancy, travel, and loss of insurance drug coverage. Open table in a new tab n, Number of subjects meeting criteria. The percentage of patients achieving IGA 0/1 at 104 weeks (68%) is comparable to rates seen in open-label extension studies of phase 3 randomized controlled trials at weeks 76 (57.8%) and 100 (58.1%).3Deleuran M. Thaçi D. Beck L.A. et al.Dupilumab shows long-term safety and efficacy in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis enrolled in a phase 3 open-label extension study.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 82: 377-388Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar,4Beck L.A. Thaçi D. Deleuran M. et al.Dupilumab provides favorable safety and sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in an open-label study of adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020; 21: 567-577Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar The majority of patients with IGA 0/1 at 52 weeks maintained IGA 0/1 at 104 weeks (89%), and delayed response beyond 52 weeks was less common (33%). In further support of favorable long-term outcomes, all patients on a concomitant systemic therapy (cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolic acid, or prednisone) for at least 12 weeks prior to initiating dupilumab treatment (n = 18; 12%) were able to stop that treatment before 104 weeks. Importantly, drug survival remained high (80%) at 104 weeks of treatment, with the majority of discontinuations occurring between 16 and 52 weeks due to lack of efficacy or AE. No new safety signals were identified beyond 52 weeks, with fewer patients reporting AEs compared with earlier in the treatment period. Limitations of this study include the lack of control arm and reliance on patient charts to assess outcomes. Overall, these results support the long-term use of dupilumab to achieve sustained control of moderate-to-severe AD in real-world clinical practice. Dr Drucker has received compensation from the British Journal of Dermatology (reviewer and section editor), American Academy of Dermatology (guidelines writer), and National Eczema Association (grant reviewer). He has been a paid consultant for the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health. Dr Piguet has received honoraria or fees for consulting and/or speaking for AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer and has received departmental support for Cardiff University from AbbVie , Almirall , Alliance , Beiersdorf UK Ltd , Biotest , Celgene , Dermal , Eli Lilly , Galderma , Genus Pharma , GlobeMicro , Janssen-Celag , LaRoche-Posay , L'Oreal , LEO Pharma , Meda , MSD , Novartis , Pfizer , Sinclair Pharma , Spirit , Stiefel , Samumed , Thornton Ross , TyPham , and UCB and for the University of Toronto from Sanofi . Dr Yeung has been a speaker, consultant, and investigator for AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arcutis, Astellas, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Coherus, Dermavant, Dermira, Forward, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Kyowa, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Medimmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, Takeda, UCB, and Xenon. Drs Georgakopoulos and Felfeli and author Jo have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,130
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,962

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle