MP12-05 PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF LEARNERS TOWARDS VIDEO RECORDING OF THEIR OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL SKILLS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessJournal of UrologyEducation Research II (MP12)1 Sep 2021MP12-05 PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF LEARNERS TOWARDS VIDEO RECORDING OF THEIR OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL SKILLS Bruce Li, Yuding Wang, Omar Al-Jarallah, Jennifer Hoogenes, and Edward D. Matsumoto Bruce LiBruce Li More articles by this author , Yuding WangYuding Wang More articles by this author , Omar Al-JarallahOmar Al-Jarallah More articles by this author , Jennifer HoogenesJennifer Hoogenes More articles by this author , and Edward D. MatsumotoEdward D. Matsumoto More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001985.05AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: With the advancement of competency-based education, there has been increasing interest in video data collection in the operating room (OR) as a means for objective surgical skill assessment. However, studies evaluating feasibility of this new assessment method have had limited focus on the learner side. Our objective was to survey surgical trainees on their perceptions to videotaped surgical performance and its use in education and assessment. METHODS: A previously piloted online survey was distributed to all Canadian surgical program administrative staff and program directors with the request to be internally distributed to residents. All participants were anonymous. The survey was administrated over a 4-week time frame. RESULTS: A total of 138 of 548 responses were received (23.7% response rate). All surgical specialties and years of training were represented. 89% had no experience having their own operative skills recorded, while 66% reported the use of online surgical video recordings for surgical preparation. Most trainees (92%) were receptive to having their operative skills recorded for assessment, stating recordings would depict a true representation and be more objective than current methods. 95% felt that videotaping one’s operative performance could play a role in their learning; yet 52% indicated these should not be part of summative evaluation. A total of 66% expressed levels of concern with litigation issues, while 70% were not concerned with personal privacy. Trainees expressed that video recording in the OR would not be intrusive (55%), nor would it affect the “true” OR environment (56%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surgical trainees were receptive to having their surgical skills recorded in the OR for educational purposes and felt that recordings would serve as an objective representation of surgical skills. Provided patient and trainee consent, surgical residency programs are encouraged to incorporate and increase accessibility of operative video recording of its residents. Source of Funding: No funding was received for the research conducted © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e189-e190 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Bruce Li More articles by this author Yuding Wang More articles by this author Omar Al-Jarallah More articles by this author Jennifer Hoogenes More articles by this author Edward D. Matsumoto More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,107 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».