First Nations Students: What Some Teachers do that Make them Successful
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With the European settlement of North America, the education of First Nations children shifted from being carried out in a natural setting by all community members, communicated through observation and trial, and instructed through values, needs, and traditions; to a whole-group learning model founded on a standard curriculum based on successes and failures. For at least the past fifty years First Nations adults have demanded greater control over their children's education. Recently, the Ministry of Education in British Columbia (BC) has advocated for greater success of First Nations students by providing funding for additional support and by increasing the number of First Nations language and cultural programs. Even though the First Nations community and BC politicians want First Nations students to have more success, research illustrates that First Nations students continue to struggle academically. Yet, although research indicates that the person having the greatest impact on student success is the classroom teacher, very little research exists examining teachers who are successful in working with First Nations students. This qualitative study focused on the beliefs and the teaching techniques of six teachers who worked successfully with First Nations students. The teachers were interviewed using Haberman's Star Teacher Selection Interview. Teacher constructs related to the success of First Nations students are arranged into four key attributes: building relationships, the teaching of morality, classroom pedagogy, and teacher preparation. Teachers who work successfully with First Nations students need to build relationships by being cognizant of the environment that both they and their students bring to the classroom; understanding, appreciating, and valuing these students; and integrating First Nations beliefs into the curriculum. They need to view morality as a quality that goes beyond the four classroom walls and be proactive in promoting a holistic approach to nurturing morality. They need to maintain a classroom environment that is safe, friendly, predictable, and consistent. While none of the teachers in this study participated in teaching practicums which required them to work in a First Nations community, they all worked with a minority culture early in their careers that assisted in shaping their beliefs about working with First Nations students. In addition, teachers who work successfully with First Nations students need to be persistent in solving seemingly unending problems and protecting their students from the educational system's bureaucracy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».