Satisfying the basic psychological needs of students with refugee backgrounds: implications for their academic development, school inclusion, and psychological wellbeing
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis describes a mixed-methods multiple case study that examined students with refugee backgrounds’ basic psychological needs for competence, relatedness (both student and teacher relatedness), and autonomy (Deci & Ryan, 2000, 2008b) relative to their Canadian background peers in a small Canadian urban centre. It also examined school level differences between the students with refugee backgrounds based on whether the students were attending junior high school or high school. The Comprehensive School Health framework (Pan-Canadian Joint Consortium for School Health, 2019b) was adopted to understand group differences and to gain insights into how the school system and individual schools were either meeting or thwarting the students with refugee backgrounds’ basic psychological needs, and consequently their inclusion at school. In total, 47 students (25 students with refugee backgrounds and 22 Canadian background students) completed questionnaires that measured their psychological needs. 2x2 ANOVAs showed that the students with refugee backgrounds felt significantly less competent than their Canadian background peers. No significant difference was found between the junior high and high school students with refugee backgrounds’ levels of competence. The junior high students with refugee backgrounds reported feeling significantly less student relatedness compared to the Canadian background junior high students and the high school students with refugee backgrounds. Conversely, no significant difference was found between the high school students with refugee backgrounds and the Canadian background high school students on student relatedness. For teacher relatedness and autonomy, no significant differences were found between the groups. The qualitative data, gathered through researcher observations, document analysis, and 34 interviews with students, teachers, school administrators, and community workers, indicated that the students with refugee backgrounds’ low level of competence was likely negatively affected by many of the school and school system’s policies and procedures, especially as they relate to the early inclusion of these students in mainstream programming without adequate supports. The differences between the junior high and high school students with refugee backgrounds’ sense of student relatedness was likely a reflection of the more welcoming, supportive, and diverse social environment present for the high school students relative to junior high students with refugee backgrounds. Finally, recommendations on how schools and school systems can better support the psychological needs and inclusion of students with refugee backgrounds, especially as they relate to smaller urban contexts, are discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».