MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3194228537 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deab130.641

P–642 Does Conn’s syndrome (Primary hyper-aldosteronism) affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes? A population based study of over 9 million deliveries

2021· article· en· W3194228537 sur OpenAlexaff
Einav Kadour‐Peero, Haitham Baghlaf, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Michael H. Dahan

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Reproduction · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHealthcare Cost and Utilization ProjectPregnancyPopulationObstetricsRetrospective cohort studyCohortConfoundingPrimary aldosteronismLogistic regressionCohort studyGestational hypertensionPediatricsGynecologyPreeclampsiaHealth careInternal medicineEnvironmental healthAldosterone

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Study question Does primary hyperaldosteronism(PA) confer an independent risk for adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes, based on analysis of the Healthcare-Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample(HCUP-NIS) database? Summary answer After controlling for all significant confounders, women with PA are at increased risk for gestational hypertension, eclampsia, and operative vaginal delivery, but unexpectedly not preeclampsia What is known already PA is extremely rare in pregnancy, and our current knowledge regarding PA during pregnancy is derived only from case reports and series. No pregnancy control studies exist in the literature for this endocrinopathy. PA is characterized by autonomous aldosterone and suppressed rennin production from the adrenals. Caused by adenomas or hyperplasia, it presents with hypertension and hypokalaemia. Study design, size, duration This is a retrospective population-based cohort study utilizing data from the HCUP-NIS from 2004 to 2014, inclusively. A cohort of all deliveries during the study period was created. Within this group, all deliveries to women with PA were identified as part of the study group (n = 102), and the remaining deliveries were categorized as the reference group (n = 9,096,686). Participants/materials, setting, methods HCUP-NIS is the largest inpatient sample database in the USA and is comprised of hospital stays throughout the country. It provides information relating to seven million inpatient stays yearly, includes 20% of admissions, and represents over 96% of the American population. Multivariate logistic regression, controlling for confounders, was conducted to explore associations between PA and delivery outcomes. According to the Tri-Council Policy Statement (2018), IRB-approval was not required, given data was anonymous and publicly available. Main results and the role of chance Women with PA were older(P = 0.0001), more likely obese(10.8% vs. 3.6%), with higher rates of chronic hypertension(53.9% vs. 1.8%), thyroid disease(15.7% vs. 2.5%), pre-gestational diabetes(5.9% vs. 1%)(all P = 0.0001), and were more commonly African American and not Hispanic(P = 0.04) than the controls. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the other demographic features including; income distribution(P = 0.45), hospital type (P = 0.63), rates of smoking(P = 0.99), illicit drug use(P = 0.73) or use of assisted reproductive technology(P = 0.94). After adjustment for significant confounders women with PA were more likely to experience gestational hypertension(aOR 3.6 95%CI:1.6–8.1, P = 0.001) and eclampsia(aOR 19.0, 95%CI:2.6–138.2, P = 0.004). Moreover, women with PA were more likely to deliver by operative vaginal delivery(aOR 9.7 95%CI:6.3–15.1, P = 0.0001). However, there was no increased risk for preeclampsia in women with PA(aOR 1.47 95%CI:0.78–2.76, P = 0.23). This finding was consistent even when not controlling for confounding effects including pre-gestational hypertention(OR 0.81 95%CI:0.26–2.56, P = 0.72. There were no differences in the number of women with PPROM(P = 0.81), preterm delivery(P = 0.88), placental abruptio(P = 0.7), maternal death(P = 0.99), hysterectomy(P = 0.99), cesarean section(P = 0.76), chorioamnionitis(P = 0.99), postpartum hemorrhage (P = 0.53), maternal infection(P = 0.99), pulmonary embolism(P = 0.99) or disseminated intravascular coagulation(P = 0.99) between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no difference in other neonatal outcomes including: small for gestational age(P = 0.18), fetal demise(P = 0.85) or congenital anomalies(P = 0.15). Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective analysis utilizing an administrative database that relies on data coding accuracy and consistency. Wider implications of the findings: Women with PA were more likely to experience adverse pregnancy outcomes, including gestational hypertension, eclampsia, and operative vaginal deliveries. Neonatal complications were not increased in PA. Surprisingly, there was no increased risk for preeclampsia in women with PA, which needs to be further studied. Trial registration number NA

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,090
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,496

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman ReproductionMême sujetHormonal Regulation and HypertensionTravaux en français237 207