Constitutional federal process: essential characteristics and national-state characteristics (a comparative study)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background. In the era of global transformation, affecting the sphere of state building, the importance of complex, federal systems is increasing. To describe them, it is advisable to use unified approaches in the form of models, an important component of which is such a structural unit as the constitutional federal process. The purpose of the article is to develop the characteristics of the process of this type and compare its course in the leading federations of the world. Materials and methods. The author uses materials from the constitutions of the world’s leading federations, and in a number of cases – and court decisions, which assess federal relations. The article is based on comparative legal and comparative state studies methods. Results. The study of federations of the first settlement type (USA, Canada, Australia) indicates their complete or almost complete constitutional monism. In the adaptation of constitutional laws, court decisions played a certain role (and for the United States a leading role). At the same time, Canada demonstrates a paradoxical deviation in the course of its development from a centralized to a decentralized federation. For European federations (Switzerland, Austria, Germany), one or another version of constitutional pluralism is more characteristic. Switzerland experienced evolutionary constitutional transformations, while Austria and Germany were marked by an intermittent constitutional process. Switzerland was characterized by a gradual weakening of the original decentralization, Austria managed to maintain an initially centralized state, and Germany was predominantly characterized by a moderately centralized development vector. India, as the most successful postcolonial federation under constitutional monism, has managed to rely on its flexible use and strengthen highly centralized federal relations. A rigid, centralized vector of development was implemented in the Soviet-Russian model of federalism, and it was based on constitutional pluralism. In Soviet times, its foundation was Marxist ideology, in post-Soviet times, Eurasian identity. Conclusions. Among the leading federations of the world, there is a significant multivariance of the constitutional federal process, which prompts researchers to abandon any pre-agreed dogmas about “right” or “wrong” federalism.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle