Approaching East-Central Europe over the Centuries ed. by Marija Wakounig and Ferdinand Kühnel
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Approaching East-Central Europe over the Centuries ed. by Marija Wakounig and Ferdinand Kühnel Samuel J. Kessler Marija Wakounig and Ferdinand Kühnel, eds., Approaching East-Central Europe over the Centuries. Europa Orientalis. Institut für Osteuropäische Geschichte an der Universität Wien 19. Vienna: LIT Verlag, 2019. 258 pp. In Approaching East-Central Europe over the Centuries, Marija Wakounig and Ferdinand Kühnel (both of the Institut für Osteuropäische Geschichte, Universität Wien) have brought together a volume that showcases present work and future of scholarship on Austria and Central Europe. This is an important little volume, partially for its content (which is interesting) but also for what it represents, which is the truly international scope and methodological range of Austrian and Central European Studies (ACES) in the twenty-first century. Comprised of progress reports and ten articles, this book is an attempt to convey where ACES now stands and where it could be headed when the students of the current generation become professional historians and scholars. The first fifty pages of the volume are made up of reports for the academic year 2016/17 by the heads of eight of the nine ACES centers, which were all founded and partially funded over the last half-century by the Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung in Vienna. (The ninth center, opened in Berkeley, California, in 2017, was too new to be included in the book.) With locations in Europe (Vienna, Budapest, Leiden, Olomouc), Canada (Alberta), the United States (Minneapolis, New Orleans, Berkeley), and Israel (Jerusalem), these centers provide support for undergraduate teaching, graduate and faculty research, and community outreach. Looking through these reports, even if of limited interest to casual [End Page 159] readers, enables one to gain a fascinating and encouraging view into the diversity of scholarship and public engagement around ACES happening across the western world. Alongside the public and academic programming arising from the various centers, it is—as Wakounig and Kühnel note in their brief introduction—the work of the centers' international cohort of graduate students that truly represents the promise and possibility of ACES heading into the middle of the twenty-first century. Therefore, the majority of the volume is devoted to ten articles, one each by leading graduate students from across the international network of centers. Spanning five hundred years of historical time, the articles are organized (mostly) chronologically, with some in English and others in German. Although for most readers these articles will be found as individual works via online databases, publishing them together offers the advantage of a brief overview of the range of research possibilities and methods in ACES. Beginning in the Reformation Era, Jiří Černý (Olomouc) and Bryan Kozik (Minnesota) both examine responses to the religious upheaval in the broader Habsburg lands. Examining, respectively, the distribution of a pamphlet (Černý) and biography (Kozik), each article adds to our knowledge of the perception, reception, and response by locals to the enormous cultural shift that was the Reformation. Taking us into the palaces of the princes and nobles of that same era, Martin Küster (Leiden) examines the phenomenon of Wunderkammer, demonstrating the deeply interwoven ties between economics, social and political prestige, and art/natural history collecting in early modern Central Europe. The next three articles take readers to the time of the world wars and their aftermath. Vicko Marelić (Vienna) turns to diplomatic history in the 1914–1920 period, revealing the deep involvement of Great Britain in the question of what was to become of the former Habsburg territories along the Adriatic, including British negotiations with the Italians and Slavs who claimed territory along the sea's eastern coastline. Beáta Márkus (Budapest) focuses on the final year of the Second World War and the deportation of ethnic German civilians to the Soviet Union following the Red Army invasion of 1944–45. Like Marelić's classic diplomatic history, with its personalities struggling against larger historical themes, Márkus writes what could almost be called classic deportation history, a disturbing but necessary account of the [End Page 160] displacement of peoples during wartime, in this case the tens of thousands of East...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».