MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3194534530 · doi:10.7429/pi.2021.742067

[The conceptualization of nursing in the Italian literature: an integrative analysis to inform theory development].

2021· article· en· W3194534530 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducational and Social Studies
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConceptualizationRedressNormativeNursing researchNursingNursing theoryNarrativeNursing literaturePsychologySociologyMedicineEpistemologyMEDLINEAlternative medicinePolitical scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Nursing theories are essential for orienting nursing practice. To date, three models for nursing practice have been developed in Italy. In addition, significant epistemological reflections have been published, sparking a rich professional debate regarding the theoretical foundations of nursing in Italy. However, conceptual models from other countries are often still used, despite many difficulties associated with applying them in practice. In order to investigate and redress this 'theoretical gap' and related implications for intervention, three scoping reviews of the Italian nursing literature were conducted to examine three categories of nursing knowledge: (a) nursing practice in Italy; (b) the basic nursing concepts of person, health, environment and nursing; and (c) regulatory/normative statements regarding what nursing practice should be in Italy. AIM: The purpose of this investigation was to identify how nursing is conceptualized in the Italian literature through an integrative narrative analysis of three scoping reviews. METHODS: The Scoping Review according to the recommendations published by Arksey and O'Malley and subsequently implemented by Levac et al. has been selected as the optimal methodology for mapping nursing knowledge. At the end of the reviews carried out to answer the three research questions, the researchers integrated the results by conducting a coding of the results. RESULTS: The narrative synthesis highlighted a systemic conception of persons in their social context, 'incorporated' within relational systems. Persons are imagined as active agents with self-determination toward promoting their own health. Health, derived from levels of equilibrium between multiple systemic components and based on the person's holistic view, is a fundamental right and a collective social interest. Maintaining or promoting a person's health requires careful consideration of all these constitutive and integral elements. The nursing process is implemented through technical acts as well as relational and caring skills. Professional autonomy, influenced by clinical and organizational contexts, is expressed in collaboration with other professionals who contribute to the healthcare process. The results of this integrative narrative analysis suggest the need for a holistic vision of persons, with an active role in their health management, indissociable from the system of relationships in which this is contextualized, within which nurses are embedded. CONCLUSION: In light of the results of our investigation, the promotion of a conceptualization of nursing based on the centrality of the person-social relational system and on the active role of persons that nurses work with, this could guide approaches used in nursing education and administration. This could help enhance care provided by nurses and persons' participation in decisions regarding their own health.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,478
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,591

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,357
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle