Kicking in Diabetes Support (KIDS) Intervention Effects: Parent Reports of Diabetes Management
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives: The Kicking In Diabetes Support (KIDS) Project is a semistructured multifamily group therapy (MGT) intervention for adolescents who have type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents, which incorporates both peer support and family systems processes to improve diabetes management skills. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical utility of this intervention by examining parent perspectives and health-related outcomes. Methods: Adolescents and their parents participated in the 8-session (6 core sessions and 2 booster follow-up sessions at 2 and 4 months) intervention in 1 of 8 waves of the group administration over a four-year period. Parents completed self-report measures (e.g., readiness to change behaviors, self-management, and responsibility in T1D management) at baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up. A medical chart review documented health care utilization and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. Results: Of the 38 families that completed baseline assessments, 20 families had parent self-report measures for all 3 timepoints. There were significant improvements in parents’ reports of readiness to change behaviors and self-management. There was variability in reports of parent-adolescent division of T1D responsibility across the 3 timepoints. In addition, adolescent HbA1c levels, the number of clinic visits, and emergency room utilization were significantly reduced over time. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that parents are amenable to a MGT intervention for adolescents with T1D conducted in a clinical setting. Further, there are sustained improvements in the parent–child interactional processes related to T1D management, glycemic levels, and health care utilization during an often-difficult developmental period. Implications for Impact Statement The present study suggests that from a parent perspective, a multifamily group intervention for adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents may be helpful in improving family process constructs (such as shifting responsibility for diabetes care and self-management) and adolescents’ health-related outcomes (such as glycemic levels and health care utilization). This brief diabetes group intervention may be able to be incorporated into a variety of clinical settings, used within different diabetes subpopulations (such as with adolescents recently diagnosed with diabetes), and adapted to various types of diabetes treatment regimens.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle