"Gathering Dust Not Saving Lives": The Call for Texts Which Honestly and Straightforwardly Teach Aboriginal Children about Hiv/aids and Other Important Issues
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract / Resume In 2003, William Lindsay was contracted by the British Columbia Health Ministry, Disease Control Division to write two texts which were to teach Aboriginal children in the BC school system about HIV/AIDS. The fast spread of this illness in the Aboriginal community highlighted the need for such work to be done. However, Mr. Lindsay's texts, which were bluntly honest and candid in their explanations, were rejected by the ministry only to be replaced by a more superficial work which did little in its all-important main body to truly educate Aboriginal children about the how's and why's of this destructive disease. This paper documents Mr. Lindsay's journey through the above process and his feelings of frustration in asking why the system fails in being upfront and honest with our already streetwise and savvy kids, when discussion about such important life and death issues takes place. En 2003, William Lindsay a ete recrute par la division de la lutte contre les maladies du ministere de la Sante de la Colombie-Britannique pour rediger deux documents concus pour sensibiliser au VIH et au SIDA les jeunes autochtones qui frequentent les ecoles de la province. La propagation rapide de la maladie dans les collectivites autochtones a souligne la necessite d'une telle activite. Toutefois, les textes de M. Lindsay, qui contenaient des explications carrement honnetes et franches, ont ete refuses par le ministere et remplaces par un ouvrage plus superficiel qui presentait peu de renseignements dans l'important corps du texte pour informer reellement les enfants autochtones du pourquoi et du comment de cette maladie destructrice. L'article presente le cheminement de M. Lindsay au cours de cette periode et son sentiment de frustration et demande pourquoi le systeme n'est pas plus franc et honnete a l'egard d'enfants qui sont deja adaptes a la rue et avises lorsqu'on discute de questions de vie et de mort si importantes. In 2003, I was working as a college professor in a Vancouver, British Columbia Aboriginal post secondary institution. I was also fresh off the publication of a series of newspaper articles, an academic paper, and a children's short story book. In this context, I was approached by a representative of British Columbia's Ministry of Health, Disease Control Division and was asked if I was interested in writing a text or texts which would be used to teach Aboriginal children about issues surrounding HIV/AIDS. The purpose was to reach such ones while young and assist them in becoming aware of this terrible disease and its consequences. Prevention was to be a keystone philosophy of the project. Such education is badly needed. HIV/AIDS is spreading so fast in Canada's Aboriginal population, that it has been referred to numerous times in various mediums as the second smallpox. In parts of Vancouver, British Columbia-usually in the poorer areas where Aboriginal families live-it is also becoming increasingly common to find used condoms and needles carelessly left about in public places. Such are even found on school playgrounds, where the janitor has to carefully go through a daily ritual of making sure that all such items are carefully cleaned up before the kids arrive. As such items are potentially contaminated by life-threatening diseases, it is good that kids be educated about what these are and what they should do if they find them. Children and teenagers today are also increasingly savvy about issues surrounding human sexuality. The age of one's first sexual experience is dropping and overall sexual activity is becoming more widespread among the young. This is no surprise to myself or to other teachers working in the system. I knew of one instance where a youthful grade six girl spent the weekend with a boyfriend. The whole class was privy to this knowledge and freely talked about it. A teacher attending graduate school, casually mentioned to our class that the school where she worked had recently had to deal with a herpes outbreak. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».