Under the School Type Experimental Education Regulations- An Overview and Analysis of the Establishment of Experimental Schools by Taiwanese and Canadian Governments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Education is the foundation for public welfare, basic human rights, and the starting point for acknowledging other elaborated human rights. Education is essential for peace, tolerance, self-realization, and sustainable development (UNESCO, 2016). The 21st century information society not only needs to cultivate students' learning ability but must also anticipate changes in future knowledge. Education needs to be reformed in response to the times. Therefore, if education is to seriously consider the shift of time and the maintenance of individual critical thinking, experimental education must be added. By innovating and enhancing the learning of the new generation, we shall be able to assist student’s ability to pursue excellence (Tong Lao Zheng, 2017a). High-quality education not only enables people to acquire the basic skills of literacy and numeracy, but also cultivates creativity and understanding, the ability to analyze and solve problems, as well as developing cognitive, interpersonal and social skills. Through Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and Global Citizenship Education Development (GCED), high-quality education can be created to help people enjoy a healthy and fulfilling life, make wise decisions, acquire the skills, and attitudes to face social, national, and global challenges (Ncheon Declaration and Framework for Action, 2015). In accordance with the United Nations sustainable education policy, the Taiwanese government seeks to promote educational innovation and reform education in a more pragmatic manner. The current trend is to shift from “traditional” education to experimental education. In order to give experimental education more flexibility for operation, while also protecting students’ rights and provide them with more diverse and adaptive learning opportunities, the Executive Yuan passed draft amendments to the three experimental education bills proposed by the Ministry of Education in 2017, allowing experimental schools to develop innovative and effective school-running models and improve the quality of schooling in Taiwan (Executive Yuan, 2018). Specifically, the Enforcement Act for School-based Experimental Education” provides a space for private entities to create experimental education programs. Currently, Taiwanese private enterprises are cooperating with the National Taiwan Normal University and the British Columbia (Canada) Ministry of Education to set up the first truly international experimental education school in Taiwan, in accordance with Article 13 of the Educational Fundamental Act. This paper will analyze the development, regulation, and promotion of Taiwan’s experimental education as well as provide an overview of the current situation of Taiwan and international experimental education. In addition, it will focus on the cooperative experiment between Taiwan and Canada in the fourth chapter of the action research plan. Finally, the paper shall attempt to explain the motivation and direction of the school’s establishment and provide relevant research and suggestions for the management of experimental education program under the school-based model in the future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».