MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3198356310 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.13294

Juvenile Dystonia‐Parkinsonism Due to <scp><i>DNAJC6</i></scp> Mutation

2021· article· en· W3198356310 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Garza‐Brambila, Claudia N. Esparza-Hernández, Jorge Ramirez‐Zenteno, Daniel Martínez-Ramírez

Notice bibliographique

RevueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParkinsonismDystoniaPsychologyPediatricsDysarthriaLevodopaPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineNeurological examinationPhysical therapyPsychiatryInternal medicineDiseaseParkinson's disease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Juvenile parkinsonism is a genetically heterogeneous clinical syndrome that typically presents with other movement disorders, neurological, and imaging abnormalities.1 Most cases are caused by recessively inherited mutations. In this paper, we present a case of juvenile onset dystonia-parkinsonism caused by DNAJC6 mutation. An 11-year-old female was referred to our service because of gait and balance problems. She was currently enrolled in a special education elementary school. Parents report that pregnancy was uneventful, with no exposure to toxins, drugs, head trauma, or parental consanguinity. Since her first steps at 16 months of age, she walked “as if wearing high heels” with some balance problems. During her childhood, she developed problems with her writing, drawing, bicycling, and skating because of developmental delay. When she was 8 years old, she developed progressive rest tremor in her upper limbs, slowness, and balance problems. At age 10, she received a trial treatment with levodopa/benserazide with considerable improvement. However, she did not continue therapy because family opted for alternative medicine. Parents reported patient's maternal grandfather had an undiagnosed parkinsonian syndrome. A Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test score of 8/30 suggested cognitive impairment in different domains including orientation, attention, language, memory, calculation, and abstraction, which was later confirmed in a complete neuropsychological examination. The patient's physical examination (see Video 1 showed normal eye movements, hypokinetic dysarthria, and a “sardonic smile” alternated with hypomimia. Cervical dystonic posture with left torticollis and retrocollis was observed. Parkinsonian features were also noted; more predominant in the right side of her body, with a dystonic flexed posture of her left hand. We found hyperreflexia in both lower extremities. Her gait was observed as “high-heel gait,” with marked heel elevation and shifting standing pressure unto the forefoot. While walking, she kept elbows flexed, an erect posture, and presented a diminished arm stride. We described it as a “cock-walk gait.” Pull test was not performed because she was spontaneously falling. Laboratory tests including complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, thyroid panel, serum ceruloplasmin, urinary copper excretion, and brain magnetic resonance imaging were unremarkable. A targeted gene panel sequencing related with recessive hereditary causes of juvenile parkinsonism was performed and a variant was identified previously reported as a probable pathogen in DNAJC6 gene in homozygous state in exon 17 (NM_001256864.2c.2589delG). Based on clinical features and genetic findings, a juvenile Parkinson's disease (PD) because of DNAJC6 gene mutation was diagnosed. She was started on pramipexol 0.25 mg 3 times daily in addition to physical therapy. After 1 month, she showed a 70% improvement of her Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III examination. This is a case report of juvenile dystonia-parkinsonism. The “cock-walk” gait is characterized by a high-stepping gait walking on the metatarsophalangeal joints, flexed elbows, and an erect spine.2 Although classically seen in inherited or acquired manganism,2-4 other causes are spinocerebellar ataxia type 35 and psychostimulants.6 Juvenile parkinsonism commonly has a genetic basis.1 The clinical spectrum of these forms is broad and complex because of the variable combinations of parkinsonism with other clinical manifestations.1 Table 1 describes characteristics of juvenile parkinsonism. Clinicians need to rule out primary inborn errors of neurotransmitter biosynthesis because these may result in movement disorders with a variety of other neurological symptoms presenting at any age.7 DNAJC6 encodes the brain-specific isoform of auxilin.8, 9 Auxilins have a role in clathrin-mediated endocytosis through the formation of vesicles in presynaptic terminals, their recycling, and the uptake of material. DNAJC6 is a recessive juvenile parkinsonism gene. Some core clinical features of DNAJC6 mutation include parkinsonism, neurological regression, and loss of ambulation. Patients commonly develop other symptoms including dystonia, learning difficulties, epilepsy, and neuropsychiatric features. Most patients show limited response to Levodopa. Dopaminergic-induced complications are common.10, 11 (1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique. D.G.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B C.N.E.H.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B J.R.Z.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B D.M.R.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B The authors confirm that the approval of an institutional review board was not required for this work. The authors confirm that informed consent from the patient has been obtained. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines. There are no funding sources or conflicts of interest related to this case. In the past year from the date of submission, D.M.R. received support linked to consultancies from UCB Mexico and speaker honoraria from Abbott Mexico unrelated to this research.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,612
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,393
Écart entre enseignants0,357 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMovement Disorders Clinical PracticeMême sujetNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchTravaux en français237 207