Designing a New Warehouse to Improve Space Utilization and Handling Efficiency: A Case Study of a Production Warehouse
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Title: Designing a new warehouse to improve space utilization and handling efficiency: A case study of a production warehouse Authors: Emil Niklasson, Erik Ramström Supervisor: Joakim Kembro, Department of Industrial Management and Logistics, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University Problem description: The focus on warehousing has grown in the industry during the 21st century to increase the competitive advantage of companies. Despite this, the development of the coil warehouse at Alfa Laval has received little focus during the last decades. This is in contrast to Alfa Laval's goal of following global industrial development. Purpose: To close this gap, the purpose of the thesis is to provide two recommendations of how the production warehouse of coils can be designed to increase space utilization and make the handling process more efficient. Objectives: The recommendations to Alfa Laval are provided through fulfilling the objectives of the thesis. The first objective is to describe the current situation to get an understanding of the processes needed and which changes that are suitable. The second objective is to identify the challenges with storage of coils to know what the new solution should be able to solve. The third objective is to identify the contextual factors to take the unchangeable parameters into account. The fourth and final objective is to identify suitable configurational elements which the final recommendations will be based on. Methodology: The method used in this thesis is the case study which consists of analyzing the problem in the context of a case company, Alfa Laval. The case study began with a literature review to understand what previously had been written about warehousing. Following this, the current situation at Alfa Laval was mapped through observations and interviews of employees as well as data extraction from information systems. Finally, the collected data was analyzed to identify the suitable configurational elements which were combined into two recommendations. Conclusion: The result of the thesis is two recommendations which both decrease the majority of the identified challenges. Both of the recommendations have the same changes in the operations with a movement of the quality inspection and unpackaging from the picking phase to the receiving phase, to make it possible to pick directly to the production, and with an introduction of more structured picking and storage policies. The storage of the first recommendation is to use cantilever racks and to store the coils without pallets. The second recommendation is to automate the picking and put-away process through installation of an overhead crane with the coils stacked on the ground without aisles.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».