Psychiatry Patients With Long COVID-19 Need Team-Based, Coordinated Care
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & ResearchFull AccessPsychiatry Patients With Long COVID-19 Need Team-Based, Coordinated CareSanjeev Sockalingam, M.D., Farah Tabaja, M.D., Kathleen Sheehan, M.D., D.Phil.Sanjeev Sockalingam, M.D., Farah Tabaja, M.D., Kathleen Sheehan, M.D., D.Phil.Published Online:17 Sep 2021https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2021.10.31AbstractThis article is one of a series coordinated by APA's Council on Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry.Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a significant focus on the psychiatric and neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although recent data suggest that approximately 18% of patients who had a SARS-CoV-2 infection develop a psychiatric diagnosis between 14 and 90 days after infection, long-term data show that approximately 1 in 3 COVID-19 patients experience either a neurologic or psychiatric disorder six months after infection. The postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 are increasingly recognized and include both physical and mental health symptoms, as well as the impact on quality of life and functioning, according to Ani Nalbandian and colleagues in an article posted March 22 in Nature Medicine. While those with more severe initial COVID-19 infection may be at higher risk of postacute sequelae, individuals with more mild to moderate initial presentations can also experience prolonged symptoms.The increasing awareness of long COVID symptoms has significant implications for consultation-liaison psychiatrists working in integrated care models within primary care and specialty settings. The following case summarizes the complexity and the important role of psychiatrists in the assessment, support, and long-term management of long COVID symptoms.Case StudyMs R was a 30-year-old teacher with a history of major depressive disorder that had been in remission for the past three years. She was referred to outpatient psychiatry by a local COVID-19 recovery clinic. Ms R was infected with COVID-19 three months prior to the referral and had moderate flulike symptoms and did not require hospitalization. Ms R reported that she never fully recovered following her acute illness and continued to have lingering symptoms of extreme fatigue, muscle aches, palpitations, and shortness of breath on exertion. Because of her protracted symptoms, multiple referrals had been made including pulmonology, cardiology, neurology, physiatry, and behavioral health.On evaluation via telemedicine, she described functioning poorly and being mostly homebound since her infection and unable to return to work. Her psychiatric symptoms of low mood, anhedonia, poor concentration, low motivation, psychomotor retardation, poor appetite, and sleep disturbances were consistent with a relapse of major depressive disorder. Ms R also described significant cognitive symptoms including inability to focus, forgetfulness, headaches, and feeling "out of it." She did not report any drug or alcohol use and was not taking any psychotropic medications at the time of evaluation.After initial evaluation, Ms R was started on a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor to target her depressive symptoms, and this was titrated to a therapeutic dose. Psychotherapy and physical therapy were also recommended. She continued to follow up with the different specialists, and extensive workup by the cardiology, neurology, and pulmonology services was unremarkable. Over the next several months, Ms R showed slow but steady improvement in mood and overall functioning. With the help of intensive physical therapy, Ms R's exercise tolerance improved, and she was able to resume most of her daily activities. She continued to follow up regularly with outpatient psychiatry for ongoing support.Psychiatry's Role in Long COVID CareRecently published guidelines and literature highlight the importance of a patient-centered approach to care for those with long COVID, according to Robin Gorna and colleagues in the February 6 Lancet and Alice Norton and colleagues in the May 1 Lancet. This includes assessment of psychological and psychiatric symptoms, connection with appropriate community resources for mood and anxiety issues, and involvement of C-L psychiatric services for more complex presentations with co-occurrence of both mental and physical health symptoms.Numerous mental health symptoms are associated with long COVID-19, and our understanding is evolving as we learn more about this condition. These include depression, heightened anxiety, fatigue, poor concentration, and insomnia. While some of these may be related to direct neurological impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, others may be more related to the stress and isolation associated with the pandemic and having prolonged, severe illness. Attempting to parse which symptoms are "organic" and which are "psychiatric" risks further siloing and separation of physical and mental health. Instead, it is important to take an integrated and holistic approach to supporting patients with these issues, using our full repertoire of appropriate biopsychosocial interventions.Because of the long-term functional impairment and complexity of long COVID-19 symptoms, patients with these persistent symptoms require a team-based approach with clear care coordination and planning, outlining interprofessional team members' roles and responsibilities. Psychiatrists and mental health clinicians need to work collaboratively with patients, primary care professionals, specialists, and other health care professionals to ensure that care is integrated and focused on rehabilitation and functioning. ■"Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome" is posted here."Long COVID Guidelines Need to Reflect Lived Experience" is posted here."Long COVID: Tackling a Multifaceted Condition Requires a Multidisciplinary Approach" is posted here.Sanjeev Sockalingam, M.D., is a professor and vice chair of psychiatry education at the University of Toronto and vice president of education at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto.Farah Tabaja, M.D., is the chief resident in psychiatry at the Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital and a first-year APA/APAF Diversity Leadership fellow.Kathleen Sheehan, M.D., D.Phil., is an assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto and clinician-investigator at the University Health Network in Toronto. ISSUES NewArchived
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».