Children’s voices from the past: New historical and interdisciplinary perspectives. By Kristine MoruziNell Musgrove and Carla Pascoe Leahy (Eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, 2019 ISBN 978‐3‐030‐11895‐2, XIX, 342 pp., £99.99 (hb)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
From the start, the editors of Children's Voices from the Past: New Historical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives set out their argument that the voices of children in the past can be heard best when methodological approaches are applied that attune the researcher to the ways children express their thoughts and feelings both in word and behaviour.This book provides 13 chapters of individual studies that vary in approach and represent both historical and interdisciplinary research.Each chapter, with its own topic and theme, centres the question of how to 'hear' children given the challenges posed by the passing of time, social and cultural marginalisation and a general disregard for children's perspectives.This collection is a contribution to the field of histories of childhood and young people as it provides rich and diverse examples of how researchers can engage with the many voices of children in creative and innovative ways.Young people's voices are found by these scholars in written documents, images, oral histories and other observations of behaviours and actions of dissent.In the introduction, the editors outline the development of debates around voices of the marginalised and specifically those of young people.They provide a useful summary of some dominant discussions concerning where to find children's voice in sources.Importantly, the editors also outline the scepticism many scholars have as to whether children's voices from the past can ever really be known given the adult mediation of so many sources as well as the passage of time that relegates experiences into curated expressions or memories about the past.Children's Voices from the Past disrupts and continues this debate by showing new ways that researchers can adapt their methods to effectively engage with the ways children of the past communicated.Highlighting just two studies in this book helps to illustrate the edited collection's value.In her chapter on uses of a Nom de Plume by New Zealand youth between 1880 and 1920, Anna Gilderdale explores how anonymity can provide a means for creating a distinctive social self as opposed to providing merely public concealment (58).Instances of hidden gender and ethnicity illuminate the many ways that young people's identities were constructed to serve the writers' aims.Focusing on historians' relationship with their sources, Deidre Michell's chapter challenges the researcher, specifically oral historians, to consider how they act as witnesses to their historical subjects.Michell presents a case for historians to act as 'enlightened witnesses' towards their participants that may help participants, who were previously victimised, to reconceptualise themselves as historical actors 'contributing to an improved world' (218).Rather than providing concrete
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,018 | 0,020 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».