MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3199382302 · doi:10.1111/chso.12497

Children’s voices from the past: New historical and interdisciplinary perspectives. By Kristine MoruziNell  Musgrove and Carla  Pascoe Leahy (Eds.), Palgrave Macmillan, 2019 ISBN 978‐3‐030‐11895‐2, XIX, 342 pp., £99.99 (hb)

2021· article· en· W3199382302 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily Barker

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren & Society · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChildren's Rights and Participation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTheme (computing)Argument (complex analysis)FeelingSociologyMedia studiesPsychologySocial psychologyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

From the start, the editors of Children’s Voices from the Past: New Historical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives set out their argument that the voices of children in the past can be heard best when methodological approaches are applied that attune the researcher to the ways children express their thoughts and feelings both in word and behaviour. This book provides 13 chapters of individual studies that vary in approach and represent both historical and interdisciplinary research. Each chapter, with its own topic and theme, centres the question of how to ‘hear’ children given the challenges posed by the passing of time, social and cultural marginalisation and a general disregard for children’s perspectives. This collection is a contribution to the field of histories of childhood and young people as it provides rich and diverse examples of how researchers can engage with the many voices of children in creative and innovative ways. Young people’s voices are found by these scholars in written documents, images, oral histories and other observations of behaviours and actions of dissent. In the introduction, the editors outline the development of debates around voices of the marginalised and specifically those of young people. They provide a useful summary of some dominant discussions concerning where to find children’s voice in sources. Importantly, the editors also outline the scepticism many scholars have as to whether children’s voices from the past can ever really be known given the adult mediation of so many sources as well as the passage of time that relegates experiences into curated expressions or memories about the past. Children’s Voices from the Past disrupts and continues this debate by showing new ways that researchers can adapt their methods to effectively engage with the ways children of the past communicated. Highlighting just two studies in this book helps to illustrate the edited collection’s value. In her chapter on uses of a Nom de Plume by New Zealand youth between 1880 and 1920, Anna Gilderdale explores how anonymity can provide a means for creating a distinctive social self as opposed to providing merely public concealment (58). Instances of hidden gender and ethnicity illuminate the many ways that young people’s identities were constructed to serve the writers’ aims. Focusing on historians’ relationship with their sources, Deidre Michell’s chapter challenges the researcher, specifically oral historians, to consider how they act as witnesses to their historical subjects. Michell presents a case for historians to act as ‘enlightened witnesses’ towards their participants that may help participants, who were previously victimised, to reconceptualise themselves as historical actors ‘contributing to an improved world’ (218). Rather than providing concrete universal conclusions, this edited collection contributes to important discussions and encourages historians and other interdisciplinary researchers to keep up the good fight in terms of locating and listening to children’s expressions whether they be opinions, emotions or disclosures from the past. This is an excellent resource for both early career and established researchers investigating the lives of children and youth in the past. The chapters are engaging and relatively short. The diversity of the themes represents the wide-ranging issues and locations of focus. Countries including Senegal, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Britain and the People’s Republic of China all feature. The locations and differing chronologies allow for shifting research perspectives and methodological approaches. While this may not be a change the editors could have facilitated given the current priorities for many researchers, more examples of children speaking to one another would be a welcome addition. Peer-to-peer correspondences, though difficult to find, would be illuminating to understand how socialisation is controlled in peer relationships where the power dynamics are more equitable. Children’s magazines or letters come to mind as some possibilities, though these are all too rare a treasured relic in the archives. This book exemplifies multifaceted approaches for writing histories of young people. Children are heard all throughout this edited collection in ways both known and previously unconsidered by me. Perhaps most importantly, I appreciated the ways that examples of complex and intersecting marginalisation featured all throughout. These children are not presented as powerless. Each of these studies highlights the ways children have and continue to speak out and challenge or cooperate with their social worlds.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,771
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren & SocietyMême sujetChildren's Rights and ParticipationTravaux en français237 207