Zeit Saic: The Entrepreneurial History of a Family Business in Argentina.(Instructor's Note)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
CASE DESCRIPTION primary subject matter of this case concerns developing an action plan to attempt to save an old line Argentine manufacturing and service firm in the face of a collapsing economy in Argentina and significant technological change making their main product obsolete. primary focus is that of general management and as such encompasses most of the business disciplines, but stresses primarily finance, marketing and corporate strategy issues. Secondary issues include the role of preparing and analyzing financial statements to aid management decisions and an appreciation of international issues. case has a difficulty level of four, and is positioned for use in an undergraduate senior level cap stone strategy and policy course. case is designed to be taught in ten class hours and is expected to require about five hours of outside preparation by students. CASE SYNOPSIS This case follows the career of George Brown, particularly in relation to Zeit, S.A.I.C., his family's business. After an on and off early association with Zeit, George, late in his career, joined the Company permanently in 1990 as V.P. In 1998, against the objections of his family, he purchased full control of the Company. That year was momentous since it began a steep decline in the business fortunes of Zeit precipitated by both changing technology and the Argentine financial collapse. setting for student recommendations is in the middle 2003, near the bottom of the Argentine depression. INSTRUCTORS' NOTES Recommendations for Teaching Approaches Suggested case questions follow. These questions have been tested with management students at Pontifical catholic University of Argentina during Spring 2005 and were found to be useful and entertaining for students. We welcome your comments after application in your courses. Our answers to the suggested questions can be found following the questions. SUGGESTED CASE QUESTIONS 1. case mentions Avenida de Mayo in Bs.As. Most Argentines would have a good idea where it is located. Few non-Argentines would, but the smart ones would quickly be able to find out, at least those with an adequate international perspective. Use your skill and knowledge to decide what is the most notable man-made object reasonably near the intersection of 4th Avenue and 63rd Street in Brooklyn, New York, USA. How about the intersection of Tverskaya Ulitsa and Okhotny Ryad in Russia? internet is an excellent source for information such as this. Two good options for the question are YAHOO Map and Mapquest (both of which serve the USA and Canada.) In both cases the address (or intersection) is input and a of the area results. boundaries of the can be expanded or contracted at will. Doing so with the Brooklyn address shows the location to be near The Narrows, the connection for Upper and Lower New York Harbor, which is spanned by the very impressive. Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, the suggested answer. following link will take you there: www.mapquest.com Similar interactive maps are unavailable for many countries, including Russia. But, maps particularly of major cities are generally available. Search engines such as Google are good choices to start. Inputting Moscow, Russia map gave many choices, including the following link: http://www.euroave.com/maps/frame1.php?xcity=moscow Looking about carefully, it is obvious that the intersection is near the Kremlin--the suggested answer. 2. Exhibit 3 provides sufficient information for you to prepare a rudimentary financial accounting based income statement and a statement of cash flows for each quarter. For our purposes, assume that operating cash flow is defined as net earnings + depreciation - capital expenditures. Also assume the income tax rate is 35% and that all taxes other than income taxes are already included in expenses listed. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».