Molecular Identification of Juvenile Neoechinorhynchus spp. (Phylum: Acanthocephala) Infecting Ostracod and Snail Hosts Provides Insight into Acanthocephalan Host Use
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The role of invertebrates in some acanthocephalan life cycles is unclear because juvenile acanthocephalans are difficult to identify to species using morphology. Most reports suggest acanthocephalans from turtle definitive hosts use ostracods as intermediate hosts and snails as paratenic hosts. However, laboratory studies of the life cycle suggest that ostracods and snails are both required hosts in the life cycle. To elucidate the role of ostracods and snails in acanthocephalan life cycles better, we collected 558 freshwater snails of 2 species, including Planorbella cf. Planorbella trivolvis and Physa acuta, from 23 wetlands in Oklahoma, U.S.A., and examined them for acanthocephalan infections. Additionally, we examined 37,208 ostracods of 4 species, Physocypria sp. (morphotype 1), Cypridopsis sp., Stenocypris sp., and Physocypria sp. (morphotype 2) for juvenile acanthocephalans from 2 wetlands in Oklahoma. Juvenile acanthocephalans were morphologically characterized, and the complete internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear rDNA was sequenced from acanthocephalans infecting 11 ostracod and 13 snail hosts. We also sampled 10 red-eared slider turtles, Trachemys scripta elegans, and 1 common map turtle, Graptemys geographica, collected from Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas and recovered 1,854 adult acanthocephalans of 4 species. The ITS of 17 adult acanthocephalans of 4 species from turtle hosts were sequenced and compared to juvenile acanthocephalan sequences from ostracod and snail hosts from this study and GenBank to determine conspecificity. Of the 23 locations sampled for snails, 7 (30%) were positive for juvenile acanthocephalans in the genus Neoechinorhynchus. The overall prevalence and mean intensity of acanthocephalans in Planorbella cf. P. trivolvis and P. acuta were 20% and 2 (1-6) and 2% and 1 (1), respectively. In contrast, only 1 of 4 species of ostracods, Physocypria sp. (morphotype 1), was infected with larval/juvenile Neoechinorhynchus spp. with an overall prevalence of 0.1% and a mean intensity of 1 (1-2). Although 4 species of acanthocephalans infected turtle definitive hosts, including Neoechinorhynchus chrysemydis, Neoechinorhynchus emydis, Neoechinorhynchus emyditoides, and Neoechinorhynchus pseudemydis, all the ITS sequences from cystacanths infecting snail hosts were conspecific with N. emydis. In contrast, the ITS sequences from larval/juvenile acanthocephalans from ostracods were conspecific with 2 species of acanthocephalans from turtles (N. emydis and N. pseudemydis) and 1 species of acanthocephalan from fish (Neoechinorhynchus cylindratus). These results indicate that N. emydis infects freshwater snails, whereas other species of Neoechinorhynchus appear not to infect snail hosts. We document new ostracod and snail hosts for Neoechinorhynchus species, including the first report of an ostracod host for N. pseudemydis, and we provide novel molecular barcodes that can be used to determine larva, juvenile, and adult conspecificity of Neoechinorhynchus species.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».