Therapeutic potential of bright light therapy for the non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor: Alterations of circadian rhythms seem to be the casual contribution to sleep disturbances, depression, and other non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD).[1,2] By restoring the circadian rhythm, bright light therapy (BLT) might be a potentially new treatment option for PD. However, no studies have conclusively demonstrated the effects of BLT on the non-motor symptoms in PD. Twenty-seven PD patients signed written informed consent and were included in this study. All the patients received 1 h of BLT (10,000 lux) daily within a time frame of 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM for 7 consecutive days. Participants were evaluated for motor and non-motor symptoms before and after the treatment, followed by the assessment of non-motor symptoms on day 28. Finally, 23 PD patients completed the study [Figure 1]. Compared with the baseline, BLT significantly improved daytime sleepiness as assessed by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS, 8.91 ± 5.43 vs. 8.26 ± 4.51, P = 0.032), sleep quality as assessed by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, 9.22 ± 4.74 vs. 7.65 ± 3.79, P = 0.042), and Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2, 33.65 ± 13.78 vs. 35.96 ± 11.93, P = 0.043). In addition, there were significant differences in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores (22.17 ± 4.44 vs. 22.91 ± 3.84, P = 0.002) and delayed recall section (1.74 ± 1.91 vs. 2.48 ± 1.75, P = 0.000) between pre- and post-light exposure. There was no significant change in motor symptoms and other non-motor symptoms like depression, anxiety, and autonomic functions. At follow-up, most rating scales that reflected improvement after light exposure were not statistically significant from baseline, except Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD, 7.96 ± 4.25 vs. 8.52 ± 4.03, P = 0.006). PD patients were divided into PD with EDS and PD without EDS based on ESS scores. Further analysis demonstrated significant improvement in daytime sleepiness in PD with the EDS group after light exposure.Figure 1: The flowchart of study design and patient enrolment. BLT: Bright light therapy; ESS: Epworth Sleepiness Scale; HAMD: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; PD: Parkinson's disease; PDSS-2: Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. UPDRS: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; H&Y: Hoehn & Yahr staging; MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination; HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; PDQ-39: Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39; SCOPA-AUT: Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease- Autonomic; NMSQ: Non-Motor Symptom Questionnaire; FSS: Fatigue Severity Scale; ESS: Epworth Sleepiness Scale; RBDSQ: Rem sleep Behavior Disorder Screening Questionnaire; RBD-HK: Rem sleep Behavior Disorder questionnaire - Hong Kong; MEQ-SA: Morningness - Eveningness questionnaire Self-Assessment version.The strengths of this study lie in the comprehensive assessments of the efficacy of BLT on the non-motor symptoms in PD patients. Besides, scores for each subscale were analyzed for spotting minor improvement of BLT. Finally, to the best of our knowledge, this is a rare report in China yet. There are several limitations to this study. First, the sample size is relatively small and selection bias should be considered. Second, the control group is not included in this study; thus, the possibility of placebo effects could not be excluded. Besides, the place where patients received BLT is not a closed space; therefore, the external light environment changing with seasons could interfere with our experiment. Finally, our study lacks more objective data for clinical assessment, such as data from polysomnography, actigraphy, or data on dynamic changes of cortisol and melatonin. To conclude, BLT for the PD population is still in its infancy. BLT might be a feasible treatment for ameliorating the sleep and cognitive functions in PD patients. Due to the relatively short intervention time and small sample size, the effects of BLT seemed to be mild and temporal. Further randomized controlled trials with larger samples are warranted to clarify the optimal parameters of photobiomodulation and objectively evaluate its effects in the PD population. Funding This work was supported by grants from the Jiangsu Provincial Key R&D Program (No. BE2018658), the Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline Project (No. ZDXKB2016022), Discipline Construction Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital Soochow University(No. XKTJ-XK202001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81801253) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK 20180214). Conflicts of interest None.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».