MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3200893120

The implication for the education ministry for layperson based on Calvin's doctrine on education

2011· article· en· W3200893120 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeongseo Lee

Notice bibliographique

Revue신학과 실천 · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueEducational Systems and Policies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLaypersonChristian ministryDoctrineChristian ChurchChurch historyPopulationChurch GrowthOrder (exchange)WesternizationIdeal (ethics)SociologyQuarter (Canadian coin)LawChristianityPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophyHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The fully-grown Korean church has been criticized from all social standings since the church had lost its nature and mission filled with non-christian and non-ideal factors. The purpose of this paper is to seek practical measures to deal with problems the Korean church has and to restore the church’s dynamic characteristics in order to identify the necessity about the roles of Christian education. The most significant factor can be found in the education for layman. To deal with th layman education, this paper will analyze the church problems which have been created in the rapidly-changing Korean society. By doing so, Korean church could develop its potential to perform the ministry for layman more effectively. Theretofore, this paper concentrates on the layman education of the several roles of the Korean church. Korean church has paid much attention to its expansion and growth while it has been indifferent to its internal growth. Meanwhile, when many church members are gathered in the church, it was considered that this is the work of the Holy Spirit. In fact, that it is true that various Christian events such as revival conferences and Big Inviting Day, etc. greatly affects the revival of the church. However, it is still questionable whether the church has internally grown as much as the church has quantitatively grown. In Korea, about a quarter or a fifth of the total population is Christians. However, it is lamentable that the Christians could not act as Christians in the society. This is largely because the Korean churches have been accustomed to carrying out he ministry for the entire church itself, but having not paid much attention to each church member’s faith life. Thus, this paper will describe a right methodological theory for education aimed at laymen through the doctrine on education and find a new direction for the layman education. This will be described with four steps. Firstly, the purpose of this paper is to establish proper methodological theory on layman education through doctrine on education. To illustrate the purpose, the effects of church education for layman based on the Bible and the Historic view of the church. This will describe the direction and responsibility for church education. Secondly, this paper examines Calvin's doctrine on education and its significance for the education of the laymen on the ministerial standpoint. At the same time, it will consider in the viewpoint of education ministry how Calvin concerned about the matter based on theological basis. In doing so, this paper will emphasis the necessity of the doctrine on education and suggest its direction for future. Thirdly, it establishes the relationship between the implication of church education through the doctrine and the education for laymen. For this, it will analyze present condition of church education and based on this, it offers suggestions for improving awareness of pastors. This approach could suggest that how the doctrine on education of Calvin can be applied and performed to the layman education in the modern society. To accomplish the purposes, this paper will attempt to find the implication for the layman-education-based ministry on a basis of the doctrine on education of John calvin who was a pastor in the 16th century, educator, reformer and distinguished theologian.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,017
Communication savante0,0050,006
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,013
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,317
Écart entre enseignants0,278 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue신학과 실천Même sujetEducational Systems and PoliciesTravaux en français237 207