Supporting Community Members with Low Socioeconomic Status Engage in Physical Activity during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Editor-in-Chief: The pandemic has shown an overall reduction in people’s engagement with physical activity (PA) (1). Those with low income had the greatest reduction in PA, whereas those with high income experienced an increase in PA (1). This showcases COVID-19’s inequitable effect on people with low socioeconomic status (SES). Fearnbach et al. (1) highlight several protective factors that may reduce the PA decline, including PA self-monitoring, purchasing home-based equipment, and virtual fitness. We believe it is necessary to further explore the availability of these protective factors for community members with low SES because they may not have the time, literacy, or financial resources required for PA participation. We are not questioning the internal validity of the study of Fearnbach et al. (1), instead we would like to expand on their findings for low SES community members. Thus, the implementation of evidence-based strategies is important to support the engagement of low SES community members in PA. Although PA self-monitoring affects adherence to PA goals and levels, as discussed by Conroy et al. (2), low SES community members may lack access to the information or ability to document PA. Pampel et al. (3) emphasize the inverse relationship between SES and unhealthy behaviors, referring to the standing that the stratification system, typically measured by occupation, employment, income, wealth, deprivation, inequality, and stress, affects a low SES person’s capacity to cope. Given these circumstances, low SES community members may prefer not to engage in PA. There has been a surge in fitness equipment demand, which has raised equipment costs and resulted in supply shortages (4). In Canada, Buckner (4) found that StairMaster machines and treadmills have experienced a 200%+ surge in price since 2019. A basic training system without cardio equipment could cost over $200, whereas a single cardio machine may cost $1000 (4). Exercise bikes may cost as much as $3000 (4). These factors could pose challenges for low SES community members trying to access equipment for PA during the pandemic. Although virtual PA served as a protective factor against PA decline, virtual PA activity among low SES individuals may not be a viable protective factor because of the lack of accessibility to the Internet or devices needed to access virtual PA (5). This highlights how low SES community members may be unable to access virtual PA. It is important to support the engagement of low SES community members in PA. Jenum et al. (6) highlight how inexpensive, highly informative intervention programs were beneficial in increasing PA adherence among low SES individuals. Mediation programs that were the most advantageous to low SES individuals targeted their recognition of control, self-efficacy, and support from family and friends when confronted with PA adversity (6). In addition, alternatives during the pandemic include exercising outdoors and engaging in creative activities at home such as climbing stairs, hopping, and skipping during the pandemic (7). Furthermore, equipment can be improvised using materials such as ropes, brooms, and bottles (7). For individuals with technological access, they can follow online exercise classes (7). For those without access, telephone volunteer services could be used to support their engagement in PA (8). By implementing these strategies, it is possible to lessen the inequitable effect of COVID-19 on the PA levels of low SES community members. Nilanga Aki Bandara Balpreet Sasan Nathan Li Nicholas Feng Xuan Randy Zhou The University of British Columbia School of Kinesiology Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,045 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».