Metis Pioneers: Marie Rose Delorme Smith and Isabella Clark Hardisty Lougheed by Doris Jeanne Mackinnon
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Metis Pioneers: Marie Rose Delorme Smith and Isabella Clark Hardisty Lougheed by Doris Jeanne Mackinnon Annabel G. LaBrecque Metis Pioneers: Marie Rose Delorme Smith and Isabella Clark Hardisty Lougheed. By Doris Jeanne Mackinnon. University of Alberta Press, 2018. ix + 584 pp. Photographs, notes, bibliography, index. $45.00, paper. In Metis Pioneers, Doris Jeanne Mackinnon details the role two particular Metis women played in western Canada's transitional period from the fur trade economy to sedentary agriculture and industrial capitalism during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Marie Rose Delorme Smith and Isabella Clark Hardisty Lougheed were both born in 1861 to Metis and Euro-American parents who occupied influential positions in the fur trade. Mackinnon argues that Smith and Lougheed adapted the skills and kinship connections rooted in the fur trade to navigate the transition to new economies. While both women publicly fashioned themselves as Euro-American "pioneers," Mackinnon argues, Smith and Lougheed retained essential components of their experiences and identities as Metis women in order to adapt to new western societies. Underlying Smith and Lougheed's biographies is the Red River Rebellion, which Mackinnon weaves into the text without much contextualization. While Mackinnon discusses how both Metis and settler men in Smith and Lougheed's extensive kinship networks participated in the rebellion, the author does not fully explain the political and economic stakes of these events for the broader Metis community to which Smith and Lougheed were connected. Another pitfall is Mackinnon's contradictory claims about the "social capital" (xxvii) Smith and Lougheed "continued to contribute" (xxvii) to their marriages and, more broadly, post– fur trade societies. Though Mackinnon claims that this social capital was rooted in their Metis identities and connections, her sources indicate an opposite reality: that their socioeconomic authority, at least in the eyes of their (predominantly male) contemporaries, was tied primarily to the influence Smith and Lougheed's fathers enjoyed in the fur trade. To the author's credit, Mackinnon demonstrates throughout that the "social value" (338) of the labor expended by Indigenous and Metis women in fur trade economies has been inadequately documented by contemporary historical actors and historians alike, due largely to the "unidentifiable monetary value" (338) of this labor. Mackinnon makes clear that her purpose in telling the personal histories of these two Metis women is done so not in the service of either Canadian settler nor British imperial history. Rather, Metis Pioneers commemorates the two Metis women whose methods of survival in increasingly settler colonial spaces both reflected and shaped the much longer history of dynamic Metis identities and means of endurance. Metis Pioneers is an analytically sophisticated biography that succeeds in balancing local and family [End Page 325] histories with broader historical processes that both shaped and were shaped by dynamic ideas about Metis and Indigenous identities. Readers interested in Metis women's history as well as the social history of the late Canadian fur trade will find this text as engaging as it is informative. Annabel G. LaBrecque Department of History University of California, Berkeley Copyright © 2021 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».