MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3202567782 · doi:10.1353/cbq.2021.0149

Convergences: Canon and Catholicity by Christopher R. Seitz

2021· article· en· W3202567782 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Donald Senior

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œCatholic Biblical quarterly · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipInterpretation (philosophy)Context (archaeology)WifeClassicsPhilosophyConvergence (economics)GermanHistoryLiteratureTheologySociologyArtLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Convergences: Canon and Catholicity by Christopher R. Seitz Donald Senior christopher r. seitz, Convergences: Canon and Catholicity ( Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2020). Pp. x + 189. $34.95. "Convergences" is surely the right title for this thoughtful work by Christopher R. Seitz, professor of biblical interpretation at Wycliff College, University of Toronto. He begins with an autobiographical note, explaining that the need for specialized surgery for his wife in France brought him into intimate contact with French Catholicism and French biblical scholarship. S., an ordained Episcopalian priest, and his wife were welcomed by a vibrant Catholic parish in France—a first and happy convergence. And during his time there he also was introduced to the work of the late Paul Beauchamp, a French Jesuit whose interest in canonical interpretation of the Bible harmonized with S.'s own appreciation for the contributions of Brevard Childs—even though Childs and Beauchamp never directly interacted. French biblical scholarship, S. observes, has never been as enthralled with German university influence and its emphasis on historical-critical methodology as British and [End Page 710] American scholars have been, and has given more attention to patristic biblical interpretation, providing an opening to the more synchronic and theological perspectives championed by Childs. This leads to the main set of "convergences" that command the attention of this book. S.'s overarching concern is the inner relationship—or convergence—between the modern emphasis on the historical context of biblical books (S.'s main focus is on OT literature), the Bible viewed organically and theologically as Scripture and the Word of God, and the reception or the abiding lines of interpretation of the Bible by faithful Christians over the centuries. A recurring dialogue partner for S. throughout the book is modern Catholicism, with its own struggle to absorb historical-critical methodology and its attention to the canonical form of the Scriptures and the role of "living tradition" in biblical interpretation. As S. puts it, "The line we are pursuing is whether canonical reading may serve as a kind of bridge between historical-critical reading in its classic mode and the concerns articulated in the decades following the 1943 encyclical [i.e., Pius XII's Divino Afflante Spiritu], leading into Vatican II, and then into kindred developments that followed the close of the Council's work" (p. 15). Those "kindred developments" include recognition of both the value and the limits of historical criticism; renewed attention to patristic interpretation; acknowledgment of the importance of canonicity; and—what turned out to be something of a surprising yet fruitful outcome of the Council—the creation of a common Lectionary. Seitz will pursue these cross-currents and convergences under various topics: authorship and inspiration understood in view of the various strands of tradition and reinterpretation woven into the fabric of the Pentateuch and other biblical books; the use of figural interpretation in relating the New Testament to the Old; the attempt to articulate a biblical theology; the incorporation of wisdom motifs into the revelatory story of Israel; and the significance of the Lectionary as a means of bringing the Scriptures to the Christian people and the mode of interpretation that the juxtaposition of Old and New Testament texts implies. Coursing through all of these examples is S.'s strong theological and ontological view of the Scriptures as a whole—both Old and New Testaments—as the canon, forged ultimately through God's Spirit and, in the view of Christian faith, having Christ as its ultimate goal and underlying rationale. Here is where both Childs and his kindred spirit, Paul Beauchamp, help inform S.'s own view. He clearly realizes that the OT writings have a life of their own and are formed and shaped by a particular originating historical context and, in most cases, over time subject to reinterpretation and refashioning within the community of Israel itself. The endpoint of Scripture in Christ was not part of the biblical author's conscious intent, but the theological underpinning of the Scriptures as a whole validates the discovery of the ultimate meaning of earlier events in the Christ-event. One of S.'s prime examples to illustrate that complex and rich connection is the Passover...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,679
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œCatholic Biblical quarterlyMême sujetReformation and Early Modern ChristianityTravaux en français237 207