MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W320261761

'Being More, Not Having More' Education for Global Change

2007· article· en· W320261761 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Hoepper

Notice bibliographique

RevueSocial alternatives · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCharterSociologyRedressPublic relationsEnthusiasmCommodificationPolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsLawPsychologySocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Earth Charter Education is currently the most ambitious and extensive initiative to pursue a more peaceful, just and sustainable world through education. It has historical antecedents in the socially-critical education movements of the past several decades. Earth Charter Education, however, has some features likely to produce more success than those earlier initiatives. At the same time, it faces some substantial obstacles. This article highlights one of those obstacles - the contradiction between Earth Charter principles and the commodified consumer culture within which most young people in wealthier countries are immersed. The author sees promise in Earth Charter Education's advocacy of experientially-rich learning. A Perplexing Episode Several years ago I presented a guest session at an elite girls' school. I spoke to senior students about work, trade and justice in our globalising world. They'd just begun a term-long study of those issues. At the end of their study I asked their teacher how they had responded. She described their interest, enthusiasm and sense of moral outrage at what they had learned about their world. They clearly appreciated the opportunity she'd offered them to engage with some stark global connections. But, she added, they were bemused by her suggestion that some of them might consider becoming teachers themselves and doing similar work with young people No, they insisted, teaching lacked both status and financial reward. In the main, their sights were set on careers in law, business and similarly rewarding areas. That simple episode seems to encapsulate a paradox that bedevils attempts to teach for a 'better world'. On the one hand, Australian classrooms abound with critical and challenging studies of (for example) global injustice. On the other, it seems such studies can fail to touch the hearts and minds of young people with enough force to change the way they see their own place in the world. In this article I explore both sides of this paradox, with particular reference to educational initiatives linked to the Earth Charter movement. In the main I focus on the minority world1. The roots of most social and environmental problems around the globe can be traced to the wealthiest nations and peoples of the world. Nothing will change unless minority world people and their institutions change what they value and what they do. That is where Earth Charter Education's most vital work will be done. Increasingly, however, much of what is analysed and advocated in this article applies to the rapidlygrowing, aspirational middle classes in India and China. What is Earth Charter Education? At its best, the flavour of Earth Charter Education is encapsulated in these words from Sally Jensen, a Canadian teacher describing an initiative at her school. (It) embraces the fundamental principles of the Earth Charter that encourages us to strive for a more just, sustainable and peaceful global society. We seek to uphold the inclusive ethical vision of the Earth Charter that recognises that environmental protection, human rights, equitable development and peace are interdependent and indivisible. In this respect, we make conscientious efforts to work collaboratively with all members of our school community - students, parents, teachers, administration, staff and other members of the local community - to help raise awareness on social and environmental issues, to learn to examine our values, to help integrate a sense of global ethics and, through school community activism, commit to a sustainable way of life that can inspire commitment, cooperation and positive change. Visionary indeed. And ambitious. Sally was describing an 'Earth Charter Festival' through which Vaughan secondary School promoted the Earth Charter among students and the wider community alike. Sally's description comes from a website collation of North American Earth Charter projects in 2005. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,066

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,012
Communication savante0,0110,007
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0200,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,097
Tête enseignante GPT0,458
Écart entre enseignants0,361 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSocial alternativesMême sujetReligion, Ecology, and EthicsTravaux en français237 207