MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3202903149

Cover, TOC and Editorial

2013· article· en· W3202903149 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arif Sarıçoban

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Language and Linguistic Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychologyCover (algebra)PedagogyLinguisticsMathematics educationPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Welcome to the new issue of The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies; Vol. 9, No. 1, April 2013. As the editorial team, we once again would like to extend our personal gratitude to those without whose valuable help and support, it would become impossible to complete this issue. Each day our team is making tremendous effort to reach the perfect in our services for our authors and readers. In this new issue we have included 10 research papers, each of which is considered highly prestigious study. Mesbah, in her article entitled “ Results of the Students’ Lecturer Evaluations and Evaluations of Their Own Learning-Outcomes in Accordance with the Bologna Process in German as a Second Foreign Language Program (G2FL) ,” she focuses on the contribution of Bologna process. She maintains that while preparing for the Bologna process at tertiary, student involvement is essential. During the university-wide, end of semester survey, students are asked to evaluate their instructors as well as their individual learning outcomes. The ultimate goal, in the Department of G2FL, is to quantitatively analyze the survey results, the effectiveness of the Department’s language teaching methods and ultimately to ascertain student learning outcomes. In his article “ Attitudinal Dispositions of Students toward the English Language: Sociolinguistic and Sociocultural Considerations ” Erdemir maintains that the status, value, and importance of a language is often measured by the attitudes toward that language. Learning a second or foreign language and attaining proficiency in it is closely related to the attitudes of learners toward the language. Surprisingly enough, in his view a few studies have investigated language attitudes of Turkish students toward the English language in Turkey. However, the same issue has not been explored among Turkish students learning and using the English language in a country where English is spoken as the first language. KaA§ar and Zengin has conducted a study on “ Perceptions of Pre-service Teachers of English towards Grammar Teaching in the Turkish Contex t ” in which they aim to investigate the perceptions and classroom practices of Turkish pre-service teachers of English employing a quantitative research design. Another interesting article by Kurtul is on “ Semiotic Analysis of the Story “The Executioner and the Weeping Face ” in which he reports that meaning is unclassified data and unshaped substance unless it exists on language level, which different languages form in various forms. That is to say that the same meaning is formed differently by each language. The said forms are the results of the functions of languages. Meaning cannot exist on its own except that it is the substance of a new form, which means that a specific form of language content arises as the make up of essence. Semiotics tries to answer the questions how meaning is created and how reality is projected by employing linguistics and logical methods drawing on signs. In the article “ The Importance of Cultural Components in Foreign Language Teaching ” Alpar points out that the relationship between the social and cultural organizations of societies and languages is the subject of folklore. Each language contains a new form of life and thought. Language learning is also a process of culture transmission. A linguist should be aware of the fact that the language and culture of the society are the interconnected parts of a whole. In this context, an educator should not only aim at teaching a language, but also help students to develop their personality by taking their cultural background into consideration. DemirbaAŸ in her study “ Performance Differences between ELT Freshmen’s Receptive and Productive Skills ” investigates whether the freshmen’s education at the preparatory school makes a meaningful difference in the freshmen’s performances who attend the preparatory program and those who are exempt from this program. Thus, it will lead to analyze the fact that whether the foreign language instruction that is offered at the preparatory school make learners more successful when they start their education in the department and in what skills the preparatory school helps learners develop more. In doing so, the efficiency of the preparatory school will become clearer, and both teachers and learners will be aware of their level of achievement. KayaoAŸlu has made a study on “ The Use of Corpus for Close Synonyms ” in which he reports that using corpora is still in its infancy in foreign language classes in spite of its great benefits and potential to offer solutions to the various challenges in foreign language instruction both for teachers and learners. This partly stems from a lack of interest and practical knowledge about the pedagogic role that the corpora can play. There is a pressing need to convince teachers of the great benefits of corpora with empirical data. In “ Family Literacy and Second Language Literacy Research: Focus on Language Minority Children, ” YA±ldA±rA±m states that Countries like the U. S. A. or Canada have citizens from various ethnic backgrounds. Although English is the dominant language in many parts of these countries, immigrants generally prefer speaking their native language when they are in their homes. Whatever the reason for using native language at home is, when we consider the children in these families, we can say that being exposed to different languages at home and at school may be a problem for their language development. KA±rmA±zA±, in his study “ Learner Attitudes and Preferences in Terms of Learning Culture, ” aims at finding out Turkish learners’ preferences in terms of learning and teaching of culture in order to shed light on the practice of language teaching in an EFL context. Doqaruni studies “ The Relationship between Communication Strategies andNoticing Function of Output Hypothesis in Teacher Talk .” Doqaruni’s study, building upon communication strategies research and noticing function of output hypothesis, examines the relationship between these two issues in teacher talk. Lastly, Khajavi and Abbasian have conducted a study on “ Improving EFL Students' Self-regulation in Reading English Using a Cognitive T ool .” Their study strives to investigate if concept mapping as a cognitive tool could contribute to improving self-regulation of students in a reading course. Last but not the least we are happy to work with those who would like to publish their papers in our journal. Therefore, I am pleased to announce a “call for papers” for our future issues. On behalf of the editorial board, Best regards, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Arif SARIA‡OBAN Editor-in-Chief

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,539
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,476

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Language and Linguistic StudiesMême sujetSecond Language Learning and TeachingTravaux en français237 207