MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3203070141 · doi:10.1353/hgo.2020.0006

Peter Fidler: From York Factory to the Rocky Mountains ed. by Barbara Belyea

2020· article· en· W3203070141 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistorical geography · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyContext (archaeology)HistoryArtArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Peter Fidler: From York Factory to the Rocky Mountains ed. by Barbara Belyea Robert M. Briwa Peter Fidler: From York Factory to the Rocky Mountains. Barbara Belyea, ed. Louisville: University Press of Colorado, 2020. Pp. vii+359, sketches, maps, notes, index. $52.00, hardcover, ISBN 978-1-64642-015-5. Hudson Bay Company (hereafter HBC) surveyor Peter Fidler (1769–1822) is one of the more obscure figures of the Canadian fur trade. In Peter Fidler: From York Factory to the Rocky Mountains, Barbara Belyea ensures his greater prominence through masterfully editing two of Fidler's journals ("From York Factory to Buckingham House" and "From Buckingham House to the Rocky Mountains"), which he wrote over a nine-month period traveling the Canadian interior between 1792 and 1793. This volume is an admirable addition to any North American [End Page 138] historical geographer's bookshelf, for the text is a useful primer in understanding not only Peter Fidler's journeys but also the Hudson Bay Company's historical development, its literary practices, and its contributions to Canadian geographical knowledge. Belyea demonstrates how editors play essential roles in making primary sources legible to lay audiences. Her original contributions include an introductory chapter titled "Peter Fidler in Context" and extensive endnotes. I recommend that readers who are unfamiliar with the Hudson Bay Company (or those encountering Fidler for the first time) read these sections prior to diving into the journals, as Belyea provides essential contextual information. These sections outline Fidler's life, explain his obscurity among HBC historians, and provide necessary historical and geographical contexts to his journals. Moreover, Belyea demonstrates how HBC documents like Fidler's journals reflect a conservative literary culture that was developed to efficiently conduct business transactions across a geographically far-flung social network that had both North American and European participants. To modern eyes more accustomed to reading explorers' accounts published for general audiences, Fidler's journals are a challenging read—yet Belyea serves as an exemplary guide to the unfamiliar world of an eighteenth-century surveyor navigating vast tracts of the Canadian interior. Peter Fidler was a meticulous chronicler. His journals exhibit all the qualities required of an HBC surveyor. Fidler's daily entries are written in a form of shorthand akin to a captain's log. The journals' terse narrative structure—employing dashes instead of punctuation to indicate distinct ideas or temporal breaks—reflect wider writing practices adopted by literate HBC employees, who were required to produce standardized manuscript forms. Standardized lists, letters, journals, and maps were common HBC business documents. They often lost their utilitarian structure, however, when folded into memoirs by those who sought to profit off their HBC experiences by selling them to armchair geographers. In contrast, the two journals reproduced in this volume are the unedited entries of a skilled HBC employee in the field, designed for field navigation and use. Devoid of literary flourishes or sentiment, they document key events as perceived by someone accustomed to surveying, hard travel, and interacting with unfamiliar cultures for extended periods. Belyea's choice to reproduce Fidler's field notes in their original [End Page 139] structure is a key strength of the volume. Fidler seamlessly transitions between prose narrative, survey measurements, and sketched maps. Belyea chose to reproduce the latter as photocopies, inserting them wherever they appeared in the journals in their relative positions. Often these sketch maps leave Fidler's script legible, though others' small size—sometimes less than a sixteenth of a page—leave readers squinting at Fidler's annotations in vain. I found that the maps' positions on the page visually broke up Fidler's prose and sometimes left me disoriented, at least until I identified the correct narrative thread to pick up reading again (53). At other times, I wished for editorial annotations or captions for the more obscure sketches. Occasional disorientations aside, I applaud Belyea's decision to leave these elements of Fidler's journals untouched, because she rightly notes that to do so retains a sense of "how Fidler and other fur-trade writers perceived and mentally organized events and situations" (28). An important contribution of this volume is its ability to reflect how Euro-American geographical...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,693
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,199
Écart entre enseignants0,170 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle