Understanding oral health and dental care pathways of refugees and asylum seekers in Montreal
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IntroductionApproximately 25,000 refugees and asylum seekers (humanitarian migrants) arrive in Canada each year. The health of this population is fragile, often requiring urgent care upon arrival. We conducted a scoping review in order to understand the burden of oral diseases among humanitarian migrants globally. The only Canadian study we found suggested poor oral health and limited access to oral health care for this population.Humanitarian migrants can benefit from urgent dental care during their first 12 months in Canada. The dental coverage from the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) is limited to relief of pain from dental disease or fracture. The policy of the IFHP is subject to amendments that may result in precarious dental coverage for humanitarian migrants. We know little about the oral health awareness and practices of humanitarian migrants and do not understand how they navigate the dental care system in Canada. Further, the roles and experiences of dentists and allied health care providers (e.g., social workers) working with humanitarian migrants in need of oral health care have not received adequate attention from researchers.The purpose of this study was to understand oral health and dental care experiences of humanitarian migrants in Montreal in order to inform policy and services for this population.Objectivesi)To explore pre-migration dental care, current oral health knowledge, practices, and impacts of oral diseases of humanitarian migrants in Montreal;ii)To understand the oral health care process as experienced by humanitarian migrants in Montreal and their perceptions of ways to improve access to oral health care; andiii)To explore the experiences of dentists, social workers, and community leaders working withhumanitarian migrants who needed oral health care in Montreal.MethodologyUsing focused ethnography, grounded in the theories of illness behavior, social exchange theory, and the public health model of the dental care process, I interviewed a purposeful sample of humanitarian migrants who needed dental care; interviews were conducted with an adapted McGill Illness Narrative Interview (MINI) guide. I also observed mobile dental clinics providing care to underserved communities in Montreal. Further, I interviewed a purposeful sample of dentists, social workers, and community leaders working with humanitarian migrants in Montreal. Ethnographic data analysis and interpretation drew upon the MINI and the theories listed above. ResultsI interviewed 37 participants: 25 humanitarian migrants (16 women and 9 men) from four global geographical regions; 5 dentists; 5 social workers; and 2 community leaders. Pre-migration utilization of dental services was mainly for urgent treatment. Once in Canada, participants were cognizant of the causes of oral problems yet oral disease continued to have negative effects on their wellbeing. Participants who received oral health care appreciated the quality; however, the restrictive health care policy, high treatment costs, and long waiting times were barriers to care. Dentists, social workers, and community leaders facilitated the dental care process of humanitarian migrants, although they found it to be a difficult task. Suggestions to improve access to oral health care comprise a more inclusive health care policy, lower costs, public dental insurance, community dental clinics, and oral health promotion and orientation sessions. ConclusionsHumanitarian migrants in this study experienced inadequate oral health care. Their lived experiences help us to identify gaps in the provision of oral health care that should be addressed by local programming and federal policy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».