Putting the community in community engagement in an urban Indigenous context
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Overall, the research aimed to situate urban Indigenous perspectives and experiences within the field of community engagement and inform the practice of urban Indigenous community engagement. The research is focused on understanding the ways that urban Indigenous people in Edmonton are involved in efforts to address the challenges they face. As well as, whether a decolonizing lens informs engagement processes in an urban Indigenous context. For several decades, Indigenous organizations in urban centers have been working to address socio-economic inequality created by the impacts of colonization. The elimination of poverty and broader inequality is an important aspect of improving the overall wellbeing of Indigenous peoples. Public engagement is one of the tools used by government to identify issues, needs and priorities on various issues, however, this type of engagement has become a repetitive cycle that has not resulted in the kinds of changes desired by the urban Indigenous community. How can engagement processes better ensure the inclusion of the diversity of urban Indigenous peoples’ voices and perspectives and counter their marginalization? The research project used qualitative methods to capture Indigenous perspectives on their experience participating in engagement processes. The research project used Indigenous Research Methodologies (IRM) which has a decolonizing agenda that aims to further social justice. Further, IRM is informed by relational accountability, positionality and reflexivity as well as privileging the experience and knowledge of Indigenous peoples. The methods include the use of semi-structured interviews with urban Indigenous people who have experience with local engagement processes and thematic analysis was used in the analysis of the data. The research findings highlight Indigenous perspectives on identity and connection, experiences with engagement and examples of successes and challenges specific to EndPovertyEdmonton. The participants’ experiences with engagement are reflected within the five themes of representation, relational, meaningful involvement, action-orientated and self-determination. The implications of the findings point toward an emphasis on community-based approaches when working within an urban Indigenous context. That at a minimum is based on co-production but ideally supports self-determination. At the same time, the urban Indigenous population need the time and space to engage amongst ourselves. In the conclusion wise practices to working with urban Indigenous populations are put forward that align with the five themes from the research findings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».