Agricultural, Food, and Fuel Markets from the Perspective of Social History / Marchés de l’agriculture, de l’alimentation et des combustibles du point de vue de l’histoire sociale
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Agricultural, Food, and Fuel Markets from the Perspective of Social History / Marchés de l’agriculture, de l’alimentation et des combustibles du point de vue de l’histoire sociale Jodey Nurse (bio) and Ben Bradley (bio) Agricultural, Food, and Fuel Markets from the Perspective of Social History WHILE HOARDING OF HAND SANITIZER and toilet paper dominated the headlines, shortages of basic food items such as flour, eggs, yeast, and canned beans made the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic a rare moment in the last 75 years. Millions of Canadians suddenly had serious worries about exactly where their daily intake of calories was going to come from. Queuing to enter grocery stores was a dramatic break from established food gathering routines. For some, carefully planning shopping trips (for the purpose of social distancing) was a novel experience. But above all, it was empty and sparsely stocked supermarket shelves that raised questions that were uneasy and unfamiliar to most. Would needed products be available? What could serve as substitutes? Would shortages be prolonged or spread to other products? Was it fair to stock up (within the allowable purchase limits) in order to reduce future trips and avoid possible shortages? Such concerns and breaks from routine exposed vulnerabilities intrinsic to Canada's modern food system, wherein the vast majority of consumers produce very, very little of what they themselves eat.1 The pandemic, ongoing at the time of writing, has severely tested multiple domestic and global food supply chains. In Canada, virus outbreaks caused deaths, labour shortages, and shutdowns at multiple food processing plants. Border closures made it difficult for farmers to hire migrant workers, whose labour is essential for harvesting many crops. Food processors and wholesalers scrambled to reallocate such commodities as fluid milk, potatoes, and high-proof ethanol in response to abrupt changes in demand from grocery stores and food service outlets. Some front-line workers at food retailers, restaurants, and delivery services had their work deemed essential (even superheroic), while others were [End Page 243] laid off when employers cut back or closed down. Even after the initial panic buying and concern about profiteering subsided, food prices have continued to rise, contributing to a sharp increase in inflation.2 These disruptions have emphasized how, despite occasional domestic price spikes for a few foodstuffs such as cauliflower or coffee and news coverage of crises associated with food and cooking fuel shortages elsewhere in the world, most Canadians today are profoundly dependent on and accustomed to an intensely modern and seemingly stable food system that reliably makes a wide variety of fresh, safe food available at relatively predictable prices. Fully stocked supermarkets are a taken-for-granted aspect of everyday life in the age of just-on-time delivery, invisible commodity chains, diverse options of where to shop for food, and seemingly endless choices—at least for those who reside in major cities. Agriculture is a niche interest in a country where the farm population makes up only 2% of the total. As numerous commentators have argued, North Americans are more detached from the complex factors and dynamic systems that influence their food choices than ever before.3 Experts in government, business, and academia will soon be assessing and debating how well Canada's food system responded to the pandemic. They may well conclude that it has proven resilient and durable, given that no widespread or extended shortages afflicted the tens of millions of Canadians who depend on others to grow, process, and deliver the food and fuel that they need to survive.4 If, however, victory is declared for the status quo, important conversations about the nature of Canada's modern food system may end up sidelined. Critics have highlighted problems around the inequitable distribution of foodstuffs across the country; the need for more regenerative practices in agricultural production; inadequate compensation for farmers, labourers, and service workers; consolidation of agri-food industries under giant corporations; and the overproduction (not underproduction) of foodstuffs in the Global North that has led to wasteful practices and disparate outcomes for producers and consumers alike. Since the mid-1980s, new historical scholarship on agriculture and food has been stimulated by the proliferation of...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,021 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».