465 Global child rights dialogue (GCRD): what children across the globe think about their right to health
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3></h3> GlobalChild is an international project that is operationalizing the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) using a comprehensive indicator framework to develop a global child rights monitoring platform. The CRC is grounded on four guiding principles: non-discrimination; best interests of the child; the right to life, survival and development; and respect for the views of the child (child participation). Acting upon the principle of child participation as a guiding principle of the CRC, we launched the Global Child Rights Dialogue (GCRD) to seek children’s opinions about their rights, with the objective to incorporate this feedback into the GlobalChild indicators. We recruited facilitators across the globe to host workshops with children in their local areas. Using specially developed child-friendly versions of all substantive rights of the CRC, children were asked for their opinions about certain rights and how to know whether they were being implemented or not. Children at one of the sites in Russia specifically discussed articles 23 and 24: the rights to health and health services, and the rights of children with disabilities, respectively. Workshops followed Lundy’s Model of Participation, which includes the four elements of space, voice, audience and feedback. First, children were informed about the right to be discussed to assist them to form and voice their opinions within the safe space of the workshop. Facilitators (the audience) listened to and recorded children’s opinions. Upon analysis of all collected data, emerging themes were incorporated into the GlobalChild indicators. Finally, a child-friendly report was prepared to provide feedback to the children on how their input was used. Data collected, from 1,836 children in 52 sites across the globe, confirmed that when children have a safe space, time, and a non-judgmental audience, they can share opinions and insights that are often underestimated by adults. These opportunities are conducive to improving development of the children, to teaching them active listening and to instilling values of tolerance and lifelong learning. This presentation will share the collective input on articles 23 and 24 from children across the globe, as well as some of the specific outcomes from the workshops in Russia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».