Indications and outcomes of neonatal intubation: A single-center, prospective study in a middle-income country
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BackgroundThis study assessed the success rate and associated complications of hospital-wide neonatal endotracheal intubations by pediatric residents and neonatal fellows using direct laryngoscopy. Secondary objectives were to identify characteristics and indications for the procedure in a tertiary-care center.MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted. We prospectively collected performance and infant outcome data after neonatal intubation between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020.Results171 intubations were observed in 105 infants. The median infant gestational age was 31.0 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 27.5–36.0 weeks). Fifty infants (48%) were very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g; median 1640 g [IQR: 870–2420 g]). The most common indication for intubation was respiratory failure (65%). Pediatric residents and neonatal fellows had overall success rates of 66% and 98%, respectively. The success rate for the first intubation attempt was higher with more advanced pediatric residency training (P < 0.001). The median attempts for each intubation were 1 (IQR: 1–2) for both VLBW and non-VLBW infants (P = 0.48). The adverse outcome rates were 5% and 3% for VLBW and non-VLBW infants, respectively (P = 0.53). More than 2 intubation attempts was the only significant independent risk factor for adverse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 6.7; 95% CI 1.3–33.6; P = 0.02).ConclusionsThe success rate of pediatric residents for neonatal intubation was similar for VLBW and non-VLBW infants. The main indication was respiratory failure, and nearly half were infants with VLBW. To minimize adverse sequelae, written guidelines limiting the number of intubation attempts by junior trainees are warranted. This study assessed the success rate and associated complications of hospital-wide neonatal endotracheal intubations by pediatric residents and neonatal fellows using direct laryngoscopy. Secondary objectives were to identify characteristics and indications for the procedure in a tertiary-care center. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted. We prospectively collected performance and infant outcome data after neonatal intubation between March 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020. 171 intubations were observed in 105 infants. The median infant gestational age was 31.0 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 27.5–36.0 weeks). Fifty infants (48%) were very low birth weight (VLBW, <1500 g; median 1640 g [IQR: 870–2420 g]). The most common indication for intubation was respiratory failure (65%). Pediatric residents and neonatal fellows had overall success rates of 66% and 98%, respectively. The success rate for the first intubation attempt was higher with more advanced pediatric residency training (P < 0.001). The median attempts for each intubation were 1 (IQR: 1–2) for both VLBW and non-VLBW infants (P = 0.48). The adverse outcome rates were 5% and 3% for VLBW and non-VLBW infants, respectively (P = 0.53). More than 2 intubation attempts was the only significant independent risk factor for adverse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 6.7; 95% CI 1.3–33.6; P = 0.02). The success rate of pediatric residents for neonatal intubation was similar for VLBW and non-VLBW infants. The main indication was respiratory failure, and nearly half were infants with VLBW. To minimize adverse sequelae, written guidelines limiting the number of intubation attempts by junior trainees are warranted.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle