Theoretical Exergy and Second Law Analysis of Vapour Compression Refrigeration System with Refrigerants of Low and High Global Warming Potential
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Selection of refrigerants for a refrigeration device depends on many factors like operating temperature range, pressure ratio, toxicity, chemical stability etc. However the criterion, over past few years has shifted to Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) and GWP. As discussed (United Nations Montreal protocol, 1987) refrigerants with Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and Hydro chlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) were proposed to phase out as they had high ODP. Their replacements were sought in the form of Hydro fluorocarbon (HFC), but they were found to have high GWP. Thus seen in context of environment, zero ODP and low GWP refrigerants are need of the hour. Exergy in place of energy is used for analysis as it shows the degradation of energy value and helps in minimization of entropy generation. Various researchers have suggested different low GWP refrigerants as replacements for CFC, HCFC and HFC. Chaudhari et al. used R290 as a replacement for R22 and found that the COP value obtained for R290 was very close to that of R22. (Agrawal, N., 2017.) tested zeotropic blend of R290 and R600a in domestic refrigerator as a substitute to R134a and found Structure zeotropic blend was better in context of COP and compressor power. In other study Gill J.et al. carried energy analysis of VCR system with mixture of R134a and LPG and found the COP of mixture was higher. Apart from this some researchers like Paula de et al. used exergy investigation for checking the feasibility of hydrocarbons. (Arora A., 2011). carried exergy analysis and concluded that R507A is a better choice to replace R502 against R404a . In another study Joibari et.al., conducted exergy analysis for a domestic refrigerator with R600a and it was concluded that charge required for R600a was 66% less than R134a. There are many studies which analyzed alternate refrigerants based on environment and energetic approach . However in the presented work authors have done exergy analysis of VCR system and calculated various performance parameters and compared the results obtained for different refrigerants. On basis of literature survey the researchers have presented the results of studies in which parameters like COP, Exergy destruction, Exergy efficiency, second law efficiency and Exergy destruction ratio (EDR). They are calculated and their variation with ambient temperature (To) and evaporator temperature (Te) is studied.R600a is found to be the best replacement of R134a in terms of COP, second law efficiency and exergy destruction ratio. Other hydrocarbons like R290 and R1270 have performance close to R134a but are far better in ODP and GWP.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».