The Last Sovereigns: Sitting Bull and the Resistance of the Free Lakotas
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Robert M. Utley’s The Last Sovereigns: Sitting Bull and the Resistance of the Free Lakotas exposes a new angle to the history of Sitting Bull after Little Bighorn and before his death in 1890. Reading against the grain of traditional archival sources such as government correspondence and documents, Utley shows us how the Lakotas’ search for sovereignty and agency in the years after Little Bighorn contributes to the burgeoning history of this important Lakota leader. In regard to Utley’s previous work on Sitting Bull, The Last Sovereigns serves two purposes. First, it contributes to Utley’s Sitting Bull: The Life and Times of an American Patriot (2008), filling in a period that has been understudied. Second, the accessibility of the book allows for broad audiences to understand Sitting Bull’s life in Canada before his death, while making a crucial historiographical call to action for the exploration of deeper notions of Lakota resurgence against governmental authority—both from the United States and from Canada during the late nineteenth century. Ultimately, the book argues that the act of resistance that Sitting Bull and his Lakota followers deployed provides a new mode of understanding Lakota-white relations on both sides of the US-Canadian border.In seven digestible chapters, Utley positions a large cast of characters to tell Sitting Bull’s story in the Northwest Territory, a space across the “Medicine Line”—the Native terminology for what would be considered the US-Canadian border. Of these characters, Utley homes in on not only those who wanted to push Sitting Bull back into US custody but also those who built significant relationships with the Lakota leader. Major James M. Walsh of the North-West Mounted Police, as one example, exposes the contentious authority between those in control of the territories, who allowed Lakota to reside in their region, versus the broader Canadian government, an entity that wanted Lakotas removed from their lands. Utley shows readers that Lakota communities threatened Canadian authority over Indigenous communities, as their presence diminished the bison population and heightened conflict with other Indigenous communities needing bison for sustenance. The lack of food, as Utley points out, was the contributing force behind the Lakotas returning to US-occupied territories from Canada, a move that threatened Sitting Bull’s life. While his death came days before Wounded Knee in 1890, Utley provides details for why he and his followers moved back to the United States in the first place.The Last Sovereigns is accessible for both academic and public audiences. Undergraduate classes could easily read through this book to grasp Sitting Bull’s life, just as scholars of Native American history could find great use in Utley’s close examination of this understudied period. Moreover, Utley’s approach constructed a strong foundation for a more profound historical inquiry into Sitting Bull’s life and broader history of the US-Canadian border. Beyond Sitting Bull’s experiences, scholars should use Utley’s book in tandem with other studies, such as Sheila McManus’s The Line Which Separates, to examine the exclusionary citizenship that Native Americans faced during the late nineteenth century. Sitting Bull’s expulsion from Canada could also be supported through the lens of settler colonialism and how Canadian policies sought to remove Lakota communities from their nation’s landscape. One idea for those practicing ethnohistory could be to expand Utley’s work by implementing Lakota perspectives to understand the Indigenous experiences better on this trek to and from Canada. With that said, The Last Sovereigns is a significant contribution to the study of the period between Little Bighorn and Wounded Knee. It provides deeper insights into Sitting Bull’s life, which has regularly been excluded from this period’s history.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».