MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3208151056 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00501-5

Fluvoxamine for outpatients with COVID-19: where do we stand?

2021· article· en· W3208151056 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Global Health · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFluvoxamineSerotonin reuptake inhibitorPopulationObservational studyMEDLINEDiseaseReuptake inhibitor

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Advances in vaccine development have had a major effect on reducing the number of new symptomatic cases, hospitalisations, and deaths due to COVID-19, the viral disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, globally.1Tregoning JS Flight KE Higham SL Wang Z Pierce BF Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape.Nat Rev Immunol. 2021; 21: 626-636Crossref PubMed Scopus (533) Google Scholar Nevertheless, because of the unequal distribution and access to vaccines, a relevant proportion of individuals remain at risk for COVID-19, especially in low-income and middle-income countries.2Ledford H Six months of COVID vaccines: what 1.7 billion doses have taught scientists.Nature. 2021; 594: 164-167Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar Therefore, the identification of beneficial interventions to prevent clinically relevant outcomes among patients with COVID-19 still represents a major medical need. This is particularly true for outpatients, who comprise the largest population of individuals infected with the SARS-CoV-2, and for whom few effective therapies exist. Fluvoxamine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor commonly indicated for the management of depression, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and other mental-health conditions. Owing to potential anti-inflammatory effects observed in initial experimental non-clinical studies,3Rafiee L Hajhashemi V Javanmard SH Fluvoxamine inhibits some inflammatory genes expression in LPS/stimulated human endothelial cells, U937 macrophages, and carrageenan-induced paw edema in rat.Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2016; 19: 977-984PubMed Google Scholar fluvoxamine has been proposed as a potential therapy for COVID-19. Accordingly, observational evidence has suggested favourable results of fluvoxamine with respect to symptom resolution and hospitalisations at 14 days.4Seftel D Boulware DR Prospective cohort of fluvoxamine for early treatment of coronavirus disease 19.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021; 8ofab050Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar In trial results published in 2020, 152 outpatients with mild COVID-19 were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg fluvoxamine three times daily or matching placebo for 15 days.5Lenze EJ Mattar C Zorumski CF et al.Fluvoxamine vs placebo and clinical deterioration in outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA. 2020; 324: 2292-2300Crossref PubMed Scopus (344) Google Scholar The primary outcome was clinical deterioration, defined as shortness of breath or hospitalisation for shortness of breath or pneumonia, and oxygen saturation less than 92% on room air or need for supplemental oxygen to achieve oxygen saturation of 92% or greater. Within 15 days, none of the participants who received fluvoxamine and 8·3% of those who received placebo reached the primary endpoint (absolute risk difference 8·7%; 95% CI 1·8%–16·5%; p=0·009). Despite the promising results, limitations such as low statistical power and missing data for the primary outcome precluded definitive conclusions about the efficacy of fluvoxamine for the treatment of COVID-19. In The Lancet Global Health, Gilmar Reis and colleagues report the results of TOGETHER, a randomised, adaptive, platform, placebo-controlled trial.6Reis G dos Santos Moreira-Silva EA Medeiros-Silva DC et al.Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of emergency care and hospitalisation among patients with COVID-19: the TOGETHER randomised, platform clinical trial.Lancet Glob Health. 2021; (published online Oct 27.)https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00448-4Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (217) Google Scholar A total of 1497 participants were randomly allocated to fluvoxamine, 100 mg twice daily, or matching placebo. All included participants had a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 and known risk factors for disease progression (including age ≥50 years, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, smoking, conditions associated with immunosuppression, unvaccinated status, or comorbidities such cancer, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and kidney disorders). Enrolment occurred in 11 cities in Brazil. The primary endpoint was a composite of COVID-19 emergency setting retention for greater than 6 h or hospitalisation (defined as either retention in a COVID-19 emergency setting or transfer to tertiary hospital) from COVID-19 up to 28 days. Using a Bayesian analytical approach, the authors found that the proportion of patients reaching the primary endpoint was lower for the fluvoxamine group compared with placebo (11% vs 16%; relative risk: 0·68; 95% Bayesian credible interval 0·52–0·88), with a probability of superiority of 99·8%. The TOGETHER trial had low risk of bias. The allocation was concealed, participants, investigators, and caregivers were unaware of treatment assignments, and the main analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. It should also be noted that TOGETHER constitutes the largest randomised trial completed to date aimed at testing the effect of fluvoxamine for outpatients with COVID-19. Conversely, the main study limitations are related to the lack of event adjudication and to the inconclusive effects on patient-important outcomes such as hospitalisation and mortality. What are the lessons learned from the TOGETHER trial? From a research perspective, the TOGETHER trial reinforces the concept that it is possible to rapidly generate high-quality, randomised evidence even during a pandemic such as COVID-19. Undeniably, key factors for the success of this initiative rely on the scientific exchange between academic groups from Brazil and Canada and on the use of an adaptive, platform, randomised design. This research methodology allows simultaneous and efficient assessment of different potential therapies for COVID-19. From a clinical practice perspective, the results represent an important step in understanding the role of fluvoxamine for outpatients with COVID-19. In this sense, the study strongly suggests that fluvoxamine constitutes an effective, safe, inexpensive, and relatively well tolerated option for the management of ambulatory patients with COVID-19, which is particularly useful for (but not limited to) low-resource settings. Despite the important findings from the TOGETHER trial, some questions related to the efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine for patients with COVID-19 remain open. The definitive answer regarding the effects of fluvoxamine on individual outcomes such as mortality and hospitalisations still need addressing. In addition, it remains to be established whether fluvoxamine has an additive effect to other therapies such as monoclonal antibodies7Yu L-M Bafadhel M Dorward J et al.Inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in people at high risk of complications in the community in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial.Lancet. 2021; 398: 843-855Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (149) Google Scholar and budesonide,8Weinreich DM Sivapalasingam S Norton T et al.REGEN-COV antibody combination and outcomes in outpatients with Covid-19.N Engl J Med. 2021; (published online Sept 29.)https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108163Crossref Scopus (1088) Google Scholar and what is the optimal fluvoxamine therapeutic scheme. Finally, it is still unclear whether the results from the TOGETHER trial extend to other outpatient populations with COVID-19, including those without risk factors for disease progression, those who are fully vaccinated, and those infected with the delta variant or other variants. I declare research grants outside of the submitted work paid to my institution from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Pfizer, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of emergency care and hospitalisation among patients with COVID-19: the TOGETHER randomised, platform clinical trialTreatment with fluvoxamine (100 mg twice daily for 10 days) among high-risk outpatients with early diagnosed COVID-19 reduced the need for hospitalisation defined as retention in a COVID-19 emergency setting or transfer to a tertiary hospital. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,248
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,307

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,383
Écart entre enseignants0,345 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Global HealthMême sujetPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and EffectsTravaux en français237 207