MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3208387531 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3406508

AWARE characterization factor samples

2019· dataset· en· W3208387531 sur OpenAlexaff
Pascal Lesage, Anne‐Marie Boulay, Stefan M. Pfister

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2019
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Établissements canadiensPolytechnique Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFactor (programming language)Characterization (materials science)Computer scienceMaterials scienceNanotechnologyProgramming language

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Files contain 4999 samples of AWARE characterization factors, as well as sampled independent data used in their calculations and selected intermediate results. AWARE is a consensus-based method development to assess water use in LCA. It was developed by the WULCA UNEP/SETAC working group. Its characterization factors represent the relative Available WAter REmaining per area in a watershed, after the demand of humans and aquatic ecosystems has been met. It assesses the potential of water deprivation, to either humans or ecosystems, building on the assumption that the less water remaining available per area, the more likely another user will be deprived. The code used to generate the samples can be found here: https://github.com/PascalLesage/aware_cf_calculator/ The following datasets are supplied: <strong>1) AWARE_characterization_factor_samples.zip</strong> Actual characterization factors resulting from the Monte Carlo Simulation. Contains 4 zip files: * monthly_cf.zip: contains 116,484 arrays of 4999 monthly characterization factor samples for each of 9707 watershed and for each month, in csv format. Names are cf_&lt;BAS34S_ID&gt;_&lt;MONTH&gt;.csv, where &lt;BAS34S_ID&gt; is the watershed id and &lt;MONTH&gt; is the first three letters of the month ('jan', 'feb', etc.). * average_agri_cf.zip: contains 9707 arrays of 4999 annual average, agricultural use, characterization factor samples for each watershed, in csv format. Names are cf_average_agri_&lt;BAS34S_ID&gt;.csv. * average_non_agri_cf.zip: contains 9707 arrays of 4999 annual average, non-agricultural use, characterization factor samples for each watershed, in csv format. Names are cf_average_non_agri_&lt;BAS34S_ID&gt;.csv. * average_unknown_cf.zip: contains 9707 arrays of 4999 annual average, unspecified use, characterization factor samples for each watershed, in csv format. Names are cf_average_unknown_&lt;BAS34S_ID&gt;.csv.. <strong>2) AWARE_base_data.xlsx</strong> Excel file with the deterministic data, per watershed and per month, for each of the independent variables used in the calculation of AWARE characterization factors. Specifically, it includes: Monthly irrigation<br> Description: irrigation water, per month, per basin<br> Unit: m3/month<br> Location in Excel doc: Irrigation<br> File name once imported: irrigation.pickle<br> table shape: (11050, 12) Non-irrigation hwc: electricity, domestic, livestock, manufacturing<br> Description: non-irrigation uses of water<br> Unit: m3/year<br> Location in Excel doc: hwc_non_irrigation<br> File name once imported: electricity.pickle, domestic.pickle,<br> livestock.pickle, manufacturing.pickle<br> table shape: 3 x (11050,) avail_delta<br> Description: Difference between "pristine" natural availability<br> reported in PastorXNatAvail and natural availability calculated<br> from "Actual availability as received from WaterGap - after<br> human consumption" (Avail!W:AH) plus HWC.<br> This should be added to calculated water availability to<br> get the water availability used for the calculation of EWR<br> Unit: m3/month<br> Location in Excel doc: avail_delta<br> File name once imported: avail_delta.pickle<br> table shape: (11050, 12) avail_net<br> Description: Actual availability as received from WaterGap - after human consumption<br> Unit: m3/month<br> Location in Excel doc: avail_net<br> File name once imported: avail_net.pickle<br> table shape: (11050, 12) pastor<br> Description: fraction of PRISTINE water availability that should be reserved for environment<br> Unit: unitless<br> Location in Excel doc: pastor<br> File name once imported: pastor.pickle<br> table shape: (11050, 12) area<br> Description: area<br> Unit: m2<br> Location in Excel doc: area<br> File name once imported: area.pickle<br> table shape: (11050,)<br> It also includes: * information on the distributions used for each variable (uncertainty tab) * two filters used to exclude watersheds that are either in Greenland (polar filter) or without data from the Pastor et al. (2014) method (122 cells), representing small coastal cells with no direct overlap (pastor filter). (filters tab) <strong>3) independent_variable_samples.zip</strong> Samples for each of the independent variables used in the calculation of characterization factors. Only random variables are contained. For all watershed or watershed-months without samples, the Monte Carlo simulation used the deterministic values found in the AWARE_base_data.xlsx file. The files are in csv format. The first column contains the watershed id (BAS34S_ID) if the data is annual or the (BAS34S_ID, month) for data with a monthly resolution. the other 4999 columns contain the sampled data. The names of the files are &lt;variable_name.csv&gt;. <strong>4) intermediate_variables.zip</strong> Contains results of intermediate calculations, used in the calculation of characterization factors. The zip file contains 3 zip files: * AMD_world_over_AMD_i.zip: contains 116,484 arrays (for each watershed-month) of 4999 calculated values of the ratio between the AMD (Availability Minus Demand) for the watershed-month and AMD_glo, the world weighted AMD average. Format is csv.<br> * AMD_world.zip: contains one array of 4999 calculated values of the world average AMD. Format is csv. * HWC.zip: contains 116,484 arrays (for each watershed-month) of 4999 calculated values of the total Human Water Consumption. Format is csv. <strong>5) watershedBAS34S_ID.zip</strong> Contains the GIS files to link the watershed ids (BAS34S_ID) to actual spatial data.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,188
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2110,024

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,080
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshareMême sujetIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionTravaux en français237 207