MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Repositioning Organizational Failure Through Active Acceptance

2021· article· en· 5 citations· W3208823390 sur OpenAlex· 10.1177/26317877211054854

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : aff_core · poids de sondage : 5595.24 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : conceptual
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Organization theory paper on how organizations recast failure as success; the object is organizational behavior, not research.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : conceptual
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

It studies how organizations reinterpret failure, not how research is conducted or evaluated.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : conceptual
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Organization theory on reframing organizational failure as success; not research failure or research systems.

Résumé

This paper considers the way organizations respond to failure by actively repositioning the failed outcome as success. When an organization fails to meet planned goals, they do not necessarily learn from the experience, automatically terminate the plan, or persist with the failing course of action. Instead, another response is to shift original aspirations by recasting what was achieved, acting as if the ensuing failure is positive, despite indicators suggesting otherwise. As a mode of organizational interpretation, this repositioning reformats the criteria for what is success in order to move forward, enabling organizations to continue failed outcomes and their tasks that are well past their use-by date. After detailing this adjustment, we model an active-acceptance protocol on failure, discussing whether organizational effectiveness is predictable from how firms respond to failure in this way. The paper fills a gap in dialogue specific to failing by opening an alternative path to understand how organizations frame failure differently.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Organization Theory
Thématique
Management and Organizational Studies
Domaine
Business, Management and Accounting
Établissements canadiens
Brock University
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
Outcome (game theory)Action (physics)Plan (archaeology)Frame (networking)Order (exchange)Public relationsBusinessProcess managementInterpretation (philosophy)Knowledge managementPsychologyOperations managementPolitical scienceComputer scienceEconomicsFinanceMicroeconomics
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui