65 Complication rate of cuffed versus uncuffed PICC lines placed by interventional radiology in pediatric patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Primary Subject area Paediatric Radiology Background Peripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in pediatrics to offer stable access for administering prolonged courses of antibiotics, chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, or other intravenous fluids. Objectives To assess the complication rates of cuffed versus uncuffed PICCs in a pediatric tertiary referral centre. Design/Methods Research ethics board approval was sought and granted. A dual arm study design was employed with a retrospective chart review of PICCs inserted between June 2017 - June 2018, and a prospective chart review of PICCS inserted between January 2019 - June 2019 at a large tertiary pediatric referral center. Data collected from the electronic record included age, weight, and diagnosis. Line type, size, location, insertion and removal dates, and indications were recorded. Primary outcome was removal of PICC after completion of therapy or premature removal due to the following complications: infection, thrombosis, or mechanical failure (defined as catheter breakage, blockage, or dislodgement). Results The study included 266 patients. Across all patients weighing < 10 kg, 90.5% of those with cuffed PICCs and 65% of those with uncuffed catheters completed therapy. The predominant complication resulting in premature removal was mechanical failure, but this was only observed in patients with uncuffed catheters (25%). Infection was also observed only in uncuffed catheters (10%), and thrombosis (4.8%) was only in the cuffed lines. For patients weighing ≥ 10 kg, 86% of those with cuffed PICCs and 77.2% with uncuffed catheters completed therapy. More complications were observed in uncuffed catheters (infection 7.7%, mechanical failure 6.6%, thrombosis 5%). Infection resulting in premature removal occurred in 7% of cuffed catheters. There was no reported mechanical failure or thrombosis in the cuffed group. The distribution of diagnoses was relatively homogenous between the groups for most diagnoses. However, there was a higher percentage of oncology patients in the uncuffed group (23%) than the cuffed group (7%) due to the need for power-injectable lines, which were not available in a cuffed variant during this study. Conclusion All-cause pediatric PICC-associated complications rate in the neonate group for patients < 10kg in the uncuffed group is 35% and in the cuffed group is 4.8%. Whereas in the pediatric group ≥ 10kg, all-cause pediatric PICC-associated complications rate in the uncuffed group is 19.3% and in the cuffed group is 7%. There were no mechanical complications in the cuffed group and the vast majority of lines made it to completion of therapy. This work supports utilization of cuffed PICC lines in selected pediatric patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».