Investigating the Use of Children's Artwork as an Observation Tool in Early Reading Programs.
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This is a report on research conducted over the past six years on the relationship between children's art and reading levels. Findings from one study in Grenada primary schools and three in Ontario suggest that children's picture-making is governed more by mind than hand, and that there may be common cognitive skills, gender and age effects, and traits that affect reading and art. Background, Objectives, and Previous Related Investigations Perhaps the place to begin this paper is in clarifying what it is not. It is not about justi fying the place of art in school programs, nor about integrating the visual and lan guage arts. It is about considering pupils' artworks as manifestations of thoughts and performance styles?as windows for teach ers in primary level reading programs. It reviews selected references pertaining to connections between reading and art and to the content and organization of young children's pictures in addressing the ques tion of whether their artwork can provide useful information for reading instruction. Incentive for the investigation evolved from my own preliminary studies and in terest over decades in debate among art educators about children's artistic devel opment (Lowenfeld & Brittain, 1975), art as communication/language (Cohen & Gainer, 1984; Dorn, 1999), and art as cog nitive activity ( Dorn, 1999; Nelson et al, 1998). The research question was also in spired by Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences (1983), and conjecture that artistic works provide a visible display of many of these, as well as the maker's ac quired knowledge, experience and skill with media, and approach to tasks. What brought these together at the outset was an opportunity to study paintings made by young children in Grenada schools, and to collaborate with their visiting reading in structor. We were aware that her new pu pils were mainly emergent and early read ers who had almost no experience with art materials either at home or school, and we wondered if their first crayoned and painted pictures would provide useful knowledge about both subject areas. A principle hy pothesis for the research that followed was that there would be some similar qualities to and antecedents for their art and lan
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle