Mosunetuzumab Monotherapy Is an Effective and Well-Tolerated Treatment Option for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Who Have Received ≥2 Prior Lines of Therapy: Pivotal Results from a Phase I/II Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: FL is associated with frequent relapses and decreasing progression-free intervals with successive lines of conventional therapy. Later-line treatments may be less effective due to refractory disease. Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody (Ab) that redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. In the dose-escalation phase of an ongoing Phase I/II study (NCT02500407), Mosun was highly active and well tolerated in R/R FL patients (pts) who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy (3L+ R/R FL) when given IV with Cycle (C) 1 step-up dosing for mitigation of cytokine release syndrome (CRS; Assouline et al. ASH 2020). We present pivotal data from the same study from a large expansion cohort of 3L+ R/R FL pts who received Mosun monotherapy at the recommended Phase II dose (1/2/60/30mg). Methods: 3L+ R/R FL pts were enrolled into a single-arm, pivotal expansion cohort. All pts had FL (Grade [Gr] 1-3a), ECOG PS ≤1, and were R/R to ≥2 prior lines of therapy including an anti (a)-CD20 Ab and an alkylator. Mosun was given IV in 21-day cycles with step-up dosing in C1 (C1 Day [D]1: 1mg; C1D8: 2mg; C1D15 and C2D1: 60mg; D1 C3+: 30mg). Pts who achieved a complete response (CR) by C8 discontinued therapy; those with a partial response or stable disease continued treatment for a total of 17 cycles, unless disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was CR (as best response) rate by PET/CT assessed by an independent review facility (IRF) using standard response criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2007). No mandatory hospitalization was required. Results: A total of 90 pts were enrolled (median age: 60 years, range: 29-90; 61.1% male). At entry, 76.7% had stage III or IV disease and 44.4% had FLIPI 3-5. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range: 2-10). In addition to aCD20 Abs and alkylators (all pts), prior cancer therapies included anthracyclines (82.2%), ASCT (21.1%), PI3K inhibitors (18.9%), IMiDs (14.4%), BTK inhibitors (6.7%), and CAR-Ts (3.3%). 68.9% of pts were refractory to their last therapy, 78.9% to any prior aCD20 Ab, and 53.3% to any prior aCD20 Ab and an alkylator (double refractory). 52.2% had PD within 24 months from the start of initial therapy (POD24). As of March 15, 2021, median time on study was 12.9 months (range: 2.0-22.1). Anti-tumor activity was seen in most pts (Figure). Best objective response (ORR) and CR rates by IRF were 78.9% (71/90 pts) and 57.8% (52/90), respectively (Table); the median time to first response was 1.4 months. Best ORR and CR rates were generally consistent in pre-specified subgroups (Table), including POD24 (ORR: 83%; CR: 55%) and double-refractory pts (ORR: 69%; CR: 48%). Median duration of objective response and CR was not reached; 12-month event-free rates after first response were 65.4% (95% CI: 52.6-78.1%) in all responders and 80.1% (95% CI: 67.4-92.7%) in CR pts. Median PFS was 17.9 months (95% CI: 12.0-not estimable). CRS (Lee et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019) was the most common adverse event (AE; 44.4% of pts). CRS was mostly confined to C1 and generally low Gr (Gr 1: 25.6%; Gr 2: 16.7%). High Gr CRS was uncommon (Gr 3: 1 patient; Gr 4: 1 patient with FL in leukemic phase); no Gr 5 CRS occurred. In the 40 pts with CRS, tocilizumab was used in 7 pts and corticosteroids in 9 pts; all events resolved after a median duration of 3 days. Other common (≥20%) AEs were fatigue (36.7%), headache (31.1%), neutropenia and pyrexia (28.9% each), hypophosphatemia (22.2%), and pruritus (21.1%). Common (≥5%) Gr 3-4 AEs (66.7% overall) were neutropenia (26.6%), hypophosphatemia (13.3%), hyperglycemia and anemia (7.8% each), and elevated ALT (5.6%). Gr 3 neurologic events were uncommon (4.4%) and no Gr 4-5 events occurred. Common (≥5%) SAEs (45.6% overall) were CRS (23.3%, including 2.2% Gr 3-4 CRS). Two Gr 5 (fatal) AEs occurred (malignant neoplasm progression and unexplained death; both considered unrelated to Mosun by investigators). AEs leading to Mosun discontinuation were uncommon (4 pts; 4.4%). Conclusions: Mosun induces deep and durable remissions in 3L+ R/R FL pts, including those with POD24 and/or double-refractory disease. High response rates are achieved (ORR: 78.9%; CR: 57.8%) and maintained for ≥12 months in the majority of pts. Mosun has a manageable safety profile, with C1 step-up dosing effectively mitigating CRS, enabling treatment without mandatory hospitalization. Mosun represents an active new therapy for 3L+ R/R FL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Budde: Merck, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Mustang Bio: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy. Sehn: Novartis: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Debiopharm: Consultancy. Matasar: Teva: Consultancy; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Current Employment; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ImmunoVaccine Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schuster: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tessa Theraputics: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Juno Theraputics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Alimera Sciences: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; TG Theraputics: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Assouline: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec: Current Employment; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Johnson&Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Giri: Royal Adelaide Hospital: Current Employment. Kuruvilla: AbbVie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Antengene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medison Ventures: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Canales: iQone: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Eusa Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dietrich: University Hospital Heidelberg: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; KITE/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Fay: St Vincent's Hosptial, Sydney, Australia: Current Employment. Ku: Roche: Consultancy; Antegene: Consultancy; Genor Biopharma: Consultancy. Nastoupil: Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria, Research Funding; Denovo Pharma: Other: DSMC; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: DSMC, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wei: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Yin: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Doral: Genentech, Inc.: Current Emp
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».