MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W321102417

Black Christmas: The Slasher Film Was Made in Canada

2011· article· en· W321102417 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Constantineau

Notice bibliographique

RevueCineaction! · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHollywoodMovie theaterFilm directorArtSensibilityFilm industryIncarnationVampireHonourLiteratureHistoryArt historyMedia studiesSociology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Contrary to popular belief, John Carpenter's Halloween (1978) is not the first incarnation of the modern-day slasher film. That honour belongs to the small Canadian production Black Christmas (1974). This relatively unknown film is responsible for a genre that Informed dozens of Hollywood imitations and continues to be a popular part of contemporary cinema. Black Christmas is an example of how the formulaic nature of genre cinema does not necessarily restrict a filmmaker's means of political and national expression, because this film reflects a Canadian sensibility that doesn't exist in its Hollywood counterparts. That an influential cinematic genre originated with a Canadian film challenges the assumption that genre cinema opposes national cinema, and the constant exchange between cultural texts means that Canadian cinema can impact an institution as dominant as Hollywood. Black Christmas--a low-budget Canadian horror film directed by Bob Clark--follows a group of co-eds during the days leading up to their Christmas holidays. While living in a sorority house, these women repeatedly receive threatening phone calls and are eventually murdered by a man named Billy, whose true identity is never determined. This film takes place during a holiday, foregrounds the killer's subjective point of view, and features adolescent female victims stalked by a deranged male predator--all characteristics typically associated with the slasher film (1). Subjective camerawork is prevalent; the camera is often restricted to Billy's point of view so that his body remains hidden. The film begins with an extended sequence in which a shaky camera approaches the sorority house, accompanied by Billy's heavy breathing. The camera voyeuristically peers through an open window obscured by curtains, and we see male hands reach up to climb a trellis and scale the house. We see through Billy's eyes throughout the film, especially when he is killing the girls. Another slasher trope established in this film is the Final Girl. In virtually all slasher films there is a female character who knows what is going on, resists the killer's attacks, and survives until the end of the film. (2) Jess is such a character in Black Christmas. John Carpenter's Halloween was released four years after Black Christmas, but it is often recognized as the first slasher filing (3). Because it was so successful, its stylistic and narrative choices were imitated and developed by later Hollywood films. While Halloween did not necessarily copy Black Christmas, it gets the credit for starting the slasher tropes found in the earlier film. Carpenter's film also follows a group of adolescents, overwhelmingly female, who are killed by a psychotic male named Michael. It uses a subjective camera to reflect the first-person perspective of the killer, most prominently in its opening sequence that bears a striking resemblance to the opening of Black Christmas. Halloween begins with a long take from the killer's perspective, effectively concealing his Identity. The camera peers in the windows of a suburban home before entering the house. Next we see a long-sleeved hand grab a knife and murder the film's first victim. Halloween also features a Final Girl, Laurie, who is hyper-aware, fights off the killer's repeated attacks, and survives until the end of the film. There are significant differences between these two horror films, and even Bob Clark does not think Carpenter is guilty of plagiarism, as indicated by his interview on the 2002 DVD release of his film. However, he does acknowledge that his film influenced Carpenter's production. In the same interview he recalls a conversation he had with Carpenter in which he described a possible sequel to Black Christmas; this purely hypothetical films would have taken place during Halloween of the next year, and Billy would have broken out of a mental institution to resume his stalking of the sorority house. In Halloween, Michael escapes from a mental Institution to return to his former home and stalk those he associates with it. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,063
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,455

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0240,003
Communication savante0,0050,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCineaction!Même sujetGothic Literature and Media AnalysisTravaux en français237 207