MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3211527733 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-154279

Venetoclax, Obinutuzumab and Atezolizumab (PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitor) for Treatment for Patients with Richter Transformation

2021· article· en· W3211527733 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nitin Jain, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Philip A. Thompson, Marina Konopleva, Michael R. Green, Deepa Sampath, Sattva S. Neelapu, Koichi Takahashi, Paolo Strati, Jan A. Burger, Rashmi Kanagal‐Shamanna, Joseph D. Khoury, Naveen Garg, Xiaoping Su, Xuemei Wang, Hinalben Patel, Ana Ayala, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Michael J. Keating, William G. Wierda

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAtezolizumabVenetoclaxObinutuzumabMedicineInternal medicineOncologyPembrolizumabRituximabCancerImmunotherapyLymphomaLeukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Dysfunction of T cells, NK cells and other immune subsets is common in patients (pts) with CLL and Richter's transformation (RT). Venetoclax (VEN), a BCL-2 inhibitor and obinutuzumab (OBIN), a CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) have clinical activity in pts with DLBCL and RT (Davids, JCO 2017; Davids, ASCO 2020). Atezolizumab, a PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), is approved for melanoma, lung cancer and other solid tumors. Preclinical studies showed synergy of VEN and CD20 mAb with CPI (Kohlhapp, Cancer Discovery 2021; Westin, Lancet Oncology 2014). Clinical studies have shown activity of PD1 inhibition in pts with RT (Ding, Blood 2017; Jain, ASH 2018). To our knowledge, no prior study has evaluated PD-L1 inhibition in pts with RT and DLBCL histology. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated Phase II trial of combined VEN, OBIN and atezolizumab in pts with RT (NCT02846623). Eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years, adequate organ function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 x ULN, ALT and AST ≤2.5 x ULN, creatinine ≤1.5 x ULN). Pts with either previously untreated or relapsed/refractory (R/R) RT were enrolled. Pts who received prior treatment with VEN were excluded. OBIN was given at a flat dose of 100mg IV Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, 900 mg C1D2, 1000mg on C1D8, 1000mg on C1D15 and then 1000mg on C2-9 D1. Atezolizumab was given at a flat dose of 1680 mg IV (split over 2 days) on C1D3-4 and then C2-9D1-2. VEN was initiated at the start of C2 with weekly dose-escalation (20mg daily to a target dose of 800mg daily) and continued daily until end of C26 (total 24 cycles of VEN). Response assessments were done with PET imaging and bone marrow aspirate/biopsy with MRD assessment (multi-color flow cytometry; sensitivity 10 -4) at the end of C1 (prior to VEN initiation), end of C4, end of C9, and end of C26. Results: From March 2020 to June 2021, a total of 8 pts were enrolled with DLBCL RT. The median follow-up is 11.2 months. Newly diagnosed RT (n=7): Seven pts had newly diagnosed RT. The median age was 70 years (range, 52-80); 4 pts were ≥70 years; 4 pts were female. Previous therapy for CLL included ibrutinib, n=4; chlorambucil + OBIN and then acalabrutinib, n=1; BR, n=1; one pt had no prior therapy for CLL). CLL IGHV mutation status was available for 6 pts and all 6 were IGHV unmutated. CLL FISH panel showed del(17p) (n=4), del(11q) (n=1), trisomy 12 (n=1), and normal (n=1). Three pts had complex karyotype. Three pts had a TP53 mutation and 2 pts had a NOTCH1 mutation. All 7/7 (100%) pts achieved a response (complete metabolic response, n=5; partial metabolic response, n=2). Three pts proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) in complete metabolic remission after 4.1, 4.2 and 6.6 months; these 3 pts also achieved bone marrow undetectable (U)-MRD remission. One of these pts who went to allo-SCT has subsequently relapsed and is currently receiving a salvage regimen. One pt achieved partial metabolic remission and relapsed in C8, prior to a planned allo-SCT; this patient is now in remission after receiving a non-covalent BTK inhibitor. Three pts are continuing to receive treatment on the trial in C2, C5 and C12. Details about 2 pts including PET imaging and bone marrow findings are provided in Figures 1-2. Majority of the responses were seen after the introduction of VEN in C2; however, 1 pt achieved complete metabolic response and bone marrow U-MRD remission after C1 with combined atezolizumab and OBIN (prior to VEN initiation). Progression-free survival without censoring for transplant is shown in Figure 3. No pt has died. One pt developed CPI-induced pancreatitis and diabetes mellitus. One pt required dose reduction of VEN to 400mg daily. R/R RT (n=1): One pt (58-year-old male) with previously untreated CLL (unmutated IGHV, del(17p), TP53 mutation, NOTCH1 mutation) developed RT and received R-CHOP for 3 cycles with no response. The pt was subsequently enrolled on the current trial but did not respond. Conclusions: Treatment with combined VEN, OBIN and atezolizumab leads to high rates of remission in pts with previously untreated RT; all 7 pts achieved a remission and 3 pts proceeded to allo-SCT. With the limitation of small numbers, these results are encouraging in relation to combined ibrutinib plus nivolumab in previously untreated RT (7/14, 50% response rate; Jain, ASH 2018). Enrollment in the trial continues and updated data will be presented at the ASH meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jain: TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cellectis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ferrajoli: BeiGene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board . Thompson: Amgen: Other: Institution: Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding, Expert Testimony; Genentech: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Gilead: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Konopleva: F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Other: grant support, Research Funding; KisoJi: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Ascentage: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Agios: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Ablynx: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Cellectis: Other: grant support; Calithera: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Novartis: Other: research funding pending, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Eli Lilly: Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights, Research Funding. Neelapu: Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene, Kuur, Incyte, Precision BioSciences, Legend, Adicet Bio, Calibr, and Unum Therapeutics: Other: personal fees; Takeda Pharmaceuticals and related to cell therapy: Patents & Royalties; Kite, a Gilead Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Poseida, Cellectis, Celgene, Karus Therapeutics, Unum Therapeutics (Cogent Biosciences), Allogene, Precision BioSciences, Acerta and Adicet Bio: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, Allogene Therapeutics, Cell Medica/Kuur, Incyte, Precision Biosciences, Legend Biotech, Adicet Bio, Calibr, Unum Therapeutics and Bluebird Bio: Honoraria. Takahashi: Novartis: Consultancy; Symbio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy. Strati: Astrazeneca-Acerta: Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy. Burger: Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Speakers Bureau. Khoury: Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Angle: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding. Kantarjian: Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. Wierda: Loxo Oncology, Inc.: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; KITE Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,588
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations23
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207