MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3211633668 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-149969

Antiphospholipid Antibody Profiles and Thrombotic Outcomes in the Starlet Cohort of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

2021· article· en· W3211633668 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Alistair Murray, Eric J. Campbell, Ann E. Clarke, Megan R.W. Barber, Tania Pannu, Marvin J. Fritzler, Michelle Jung, Yvan St. Pierre, Leslie Skeith

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAntiphospholipid syndromeLupus anticoagulantCohortInternal medicineSystemic lupus erythematosusThrombosisAutoantibodyImmunologyAntibodyDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and clinical outcomes of thrombosis and obstetric morbidity. APS is more common in patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), with persistently positive aPLs being found in 20-30% of SLE patients. The revised Sapporo lab criteria for APS includes one or more of a positive lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-beta 2 glycoprotein 1 (aβ2GP1), or anticardiolipin (aCL). Antibodies must be persistently positive at >99 th percentile over at least 12 weeks (Miyakis et al. J Thromb Haemost, 2006). IgG anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex (aPS/PT), IgM aPS/PT, and IgG anti-domain 1β2GP1 (aD1β2GP1) are novel aPLs that have been associated with thrombosis, however, conclusive data is still lacking, and it remains unclear how best to incorporate these novel autoantibodies into clinical decision making. The aims of this study were to assess whether the non-criteria IgG aPS/PT, IgM aPS/PT, or IgG aD1 β2GP1 were associated with an increased risk of a first-time thrombotic event in SLE patients. By better understanding the risk of thrombosis in patients with novel aPLs, independent of their association with established criteria aPLs, we can better counsel patients on individual risk of thrombosis. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all participants enrolled in the SouThern Alberta Registry for Lupus EryThematosus (STARLET) database. STARLET is a prevalent cohort of 348 adult patients fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria for SLE. Serology results for LAC, IgG aCL, IgG aβ2GP1, IgG aPS/PT, IgM aPS/PT, and IgG aD1β2GP1 were recorded over the patient's disease course. Anti-PS/PT antibodies were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and IgG aD1β2GP1 by a chemiluminescence immunoassay. Electronic medical records were reviewed from March 2006 to January 2021 for first-time objectively confirmed venous, arterial, and small vessel thrombotic events, as defined by the revised Sapporo criteria. Libman-Sacks endocarditis, livedo reticularis, superficial vein thrombosis and transient ischemic attacks were not included as thrombotic events. Discrepancies in outcomes were resolved by consensus. Results Among patients in the STARLET database, 91.8% were women, 65.5% were White, and the mean age was 42.7 (SD 15). Of 348 patients, 60 (17%) met the revised Sapporo lab criteria, and of those 30 (50%) had a thrombotic event. Among patients who met the revised Sapporo lab criteria, there was an increased risk of thrombosis (OR 3.7, 95% CI, 2.1-6.6). Among the 143 patients that had at least one positive non-criteria autoantibody, 46 (32.2%) had a thrombotic event (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.97-2.6) (Table 1). Univariate analysis for the association between each non-criteria antibody type and thrombosis are presented in Table 1. There were statistically significant correlations between the revised Sapporo criteria aPLs and non-criteria aPLs; the IgG aPS/PT had a stronger correlation to LAC (Spearman=0.47) than the IgM aPS/PT (Spearman=0.38) (Table 2). In a multivariate analysis that controlled for age, sex, and meeting the revised Sapporo lab criteria, only the non-criteria antibody IgG aPS/PT was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis with an OR of 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0) (Table 3). There were 35 patients in our cohort that did not meet revised Sapporo lab criteria that had a positive IgG aPS/PT and of these patients 8 (22.9%) had a thrombotic event. Conclusions In this cohort of SLE patients, IgG aPS/PT and IgG aD1 β2GP1 were associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, and both antibodies were correlated with previously established aPLs. In our multivariate analysis, only the IgG aPS/PT non-criteria antibody was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, independent of revised Sapporo criteria aPLs, with an OR of 2.8 (95% CI, 1.3-6.0). Not all patients in the STARLET database had non-criteria aPL autoantibodies measured, and so a smaller sample size may have affected our ability to detect associations with thrombosis. Given the limited data in the area, this valuable information can help inform clinician and patient decision making and provide further guidance on the role of non-criteria antibody testing for patients with SLE. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Barber: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria. Fritzler: MitogenDx Laboratory: Current Employment; Werfen International: Consultancy; Aesku Group: Consultancy; Alexion Canada: Consultancy. Skeith: CSL Behring: Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→Travaux en français237 207→