MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3211716756 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-153928

Shared and Distinct Genetic Features in Human and Canine B-Cell Lymphomas

2021· article· en· W3211716756 sur OpenAlexaff
Tiana Hillman, Matthew C. Cheung, Bruno M. Grande, Kevin Bushell, Sarah E. Arthur, Miguel Alcaide, Nicole Thomas, Kostiantyn Dreval, Jovanveer Shoker, Krishanna Campbell, Stephanie Wong, Ryan D. Morin, Krysta M. Coyle

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVeterinary Oncology Research
Établissements canadiensCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreSimon Fraser University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLymphomaBiologyCBCLComparative genomic hybridizationCDKN2AImmunophenotypingMutationB-cell lymphomaCancer researchGeneticsMolecular biologyPathologyCancerGeneMedicineImmunologyFlow cytometryChromosome

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Animal models of human cancers are an important tool for the development and preclinical evaluation of new treatments. Canine B-cell lymphoma (cBCL) is an appealing alternative to murine preclinical models due to its frequent, spontaneous incidence and its clinical and histological similarity to human B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The potential utility of cBCL as a veterinary model of human B-cell lymphomas would be bolstered by a more complete understanding of the genetic features found in cBCL. Methods To study the genetics of cBCL, we obtained fresh frozen and matched plasma/serum from 86 patients from the Canine Comparative Oncology Genomic Consortium(CCOGC) with 65 confirmed as B-cell lymphomas by immunophenotyping. Tumor DNA was prepared into libraries using the QIAseq FX DNA Library Kit (Qiagen). Plasma and serum DNA was prepared into libraries using the NebNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit. Targeted hybridization enrichment was performed on the libraries using our custom baits and sequencing reads were aligned to canFam3.1 using Geneious and each mutation was visually confirmed. Variants were annotated with Variant Effect Predictor and human-dog pairwise alignments were extracted from Ensembl to identify the orthologous human amino acid for all canine variants. Results Our analysis confirmed the previously reported high frequency of mutations in TRAF3 and FBXW7. We also observed mutations in POT1, TP53, and SETD2 at similar frequencies to those reported in previous studies. DDX3X was mutated in 20% of cases, which is substantially higher than previously reported. MYC mutations were also more frequent (13%) than has been previously described in cBCL. In human lymphomas, MYC is commonly deregulated by translocation to a potent enhancer and these events are often associated with point mutations in MYC that are induced by aberrant somatic hypermutation (aSHM). Interestingly, we identified a more focal pattern of MYC mutations in cBCL that implies they do not result from aSHM and are likely functional. This finding implicates the conserved MYC phosphodegron sequence, a motif commonly mutated among additional aSHM-associated mutations, as the target of bona fide driver mutations in both human and cBCLs. Mutations in FBXW7 primarily affected the substrate recognition domain responsible for MYC degradation. The observation that MYC and FBXW7 mutations did not co-occur in any canine patient is consistent with the notion that FBXW7 mutations operate as an alternative path to MYC stabilization which is not frequently observed in human NHL. DDX3X was one of the most frequently mutated genes in our cohort (20%). DDX3X mutations are common in human Burkitt lymphoma and, though less abundant in hDLBCL, tend to be observed in samples with MYC translocations. In Burkitt lymphoma, these mutations display a sex-specific pattern, wherein females show mainly missense mutations, while males are affected by loss-of-function mutations. Interestingly, all DDX3X mutations in cBCL are missense variants and are presumed to be dominant acting. This lack of sex difference in DDX3X mutations is an important distinction between human and canine B-cell lymphomas that warrants further exploration. Conclusions Our study has revealed key differences in the mutational profiles of canine and human B-cell lymphomas and provides an impetus for enhanced genomic characterization of canine lymphomas as a model for human NHL, particularly in clinical trial settings. Disclosures Grande: Sage Bionetworks: Current Employment. Alcaide: GA Diagnostics AB: Current Employment. Morin: Celgene: Consultancy; Foundation for Burkitt Lymphoma Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Patents & Royalties. Coyle: Allakos, Inc.: Consultancy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,220
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,287

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetVeterinary Oncology ResearchTravaux en français237 207