Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This research unravels the ways in which personhood, informed by cultural and aesthetic sensibilities, directs and determines how design is mediated and realized. By proposing and revealing the framework of an individual practice it offers a template for design to recognise and include the self, as a critical function of practice.<br><br> The arc of this research begins with a recognition of the significance of a set of destabilising emotional conditions. A diffusion of uncertainty, anxiety, unease, and longing, experienced and felt in the doing of design became the portal through which the research found its pathway. This process in its essential subjectivity, allows me, as a practitioner to exercise an individual right to authentic experience (Spivak, 2014). The method in turn, abstracts both my individual practice and its particular elements into an intellectual proposition, that offers a meaningful model for individual agency in design. <br><br> The experience of flux, revealed, or felt, as an emotional state, points to implicit conflict in the negotiation of competing values and epistemies. The research suggests that these polarities within the individual are a consequence of being situated between dualities or multiplicities of material, cultural, and aesthetic paradigms. While the boundaries of what these might be not clear-cut or definitive, the categorisation assists a triangulation of entities and provides a space within which this flux is metaphorically situated. Within this construct, practice is then viewed through the ambiguities thrown up by the variances implicit in each of these three areas-resulting in a perpetual condition of alterity, within the exercising of practice. <br><br> On unpacking this, the provenances of cultural biases, intuited and absorbed histories, and internalized mythologies, are slowly revealed and recognised. This allows an acceptance of the complexity of the condition, and in that, a celebration of these enduring ambiguities. Instead then, of seeking ways to achieve stasis, the research finds meaning and value in the negotiation between dualities or polarities of conditions, and offers a way to celebrate and intensify these alteric conditions by enriching and expanding the spaces within which they operate. <br><br> The approach to this inquiry is phenomenological. The abstraction is realized through a reflexive enquiry, whilst its authentication is attempted through an interrogation of meanings, implications and understandings. Drawing on artefacts and design projects across three decades, exercised in New Delhi, India, Melbourne, Australia and Vancouver, Canada, the research concludes with a propositional model for constructing a narrative of practice. <br><br> This research reveals the salience and roots of tacit knowledge within the individual. The iterative exploratory approach disciplined by the reflexive act offers a template for deepening an understanding of the self in relation to practice. <br><br> The emergent concept of InWorlding, contributes to the discourse on design practice, especially within the domain of design in the pluriverse. It suggests that knowledge is in constant flux between dominant and hidden narratives, and expresses itself alternately between the tacit and the explicit ways of knowing in practice. As a contribution to method, the six designerly ways of InWorlding, contribute to ways in which this knowledge may be explicated to address and enrich a richer prospect of practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».