MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3211871096 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-147614

A Randomized, Phase 3 Trial of Fedratinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients with Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis Previously Treated with Ruxolitinib (FREEDOM2)

2021· article· en· W3211871096 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicola Vianelli, Giulia Benevolo, Alessandro M. Vannucchi, Claire Harrison, Michaël Loschi, Haifa Kathrin Al‐Ali, Massimiliano Bonifacio, Francisco Cervantes, Tomasz Wróbel, Giovanni Barosi, Jean-Jaques Kiladjian, Srđan Verstovšek, Ruben A. Mesa, Shelonitda Rose, Vishwanath Gharpure, Christopher Hernandez, Jun Zhang, Francesco Passamonti

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRuxolitinibMyelofibrosisInternal medicineAdverse effectPopulationClinical trialPhases of clinical researchSurgeryPediatricsBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Until recently, ruxolitinib (RUX) was the only drug approved for treatment of intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF). Many patients discontinue RUX due to lack of response, loss of efficacy, or intolerance. Fedratinib (INREBIC) is an oral, selective kinase inhibitor with activity against mutant and wild-type JAK2 and FLT3. Fedratinib is approved in the United States, Canada, European Union, United Kingdom, and elsewhere as front-line therapy for treatment of patients with JAK-inhibitor-naïve MF and those previously treated with RUX. In the single-arm, phase 2 JAKARTA2 trial of fedratinib 400 mg/day (starting dose) in patients with MF relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to prior RUX, 31% of pts achieved a spleen volume response and 27% achieved a symptom response with fedratinib (Harrison, Am J Hematol 2020). Gastrointestinal (GI) events were among the most common adverse events (AEs) reported during fedratinib treatment in JAKARTA2. A clinical hold was placed on fedratinib in November 2013 due to suspected cases of Wernicke encephalopathy (WE); the hold was later lifted but long-term data, including survival outcomes, are limited for fedratinib. Two phase 3 trials, FREEDOM (NCT03755518) and FREEDOM2 (NCT03952039) are ongoing to assess the safety and efficacy of fedratinib in patients with MF previously treated with RUX. Unlike earlier studies of fedratinib, these two trials prospectively include GI-directed mitigation strategies and thiamine monitoring and supplementation. Preliminary data from the single-arm FREEDOM trial show reduced incidence of GI AEs with these mitigation strategies (Gupta, CLML 2020). Here we describe the study design and methods for the FREEDOM2 trial, the first trial to compare fedratinib vs. active MF therapies. Study Design and Methods: The ongoing multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 FREEDOM2 trial is enrolling patients with MF in the European Union, China, Russia, South Korea, and Australia. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years; primary, post-polycythemia vera (post-PV), or post-essential thrombocythemia (post-ET) MF; DIPSS Intermediate-2 or High-risk disease; splenomegaly, defined as spleen volume ≥ 450 cm 3 by MRI/CT and palpable spleen measuring ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin; ECOG PS score ≤ 2; and platelet count ≥ 50 ×10 9/L (Figure). Patients must have been relapsed or refractory to prior RUX treatment for ≥ 3 months, or intolerant to RUX after ≥ 28 days of treatment (i.e., developed RBC transfusion dependence [≥ 2 units/month for 2 months] or grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia, anemia, or hematoma/hemorrhage). Eligible patients are randomized 2:1 to receive fedratinib 400 mg/day or investigator-selected best available therapy (BAT), including RUX or other approved JAK inhibitors, in repeated 28-day treatment cycles (Figure). Spleen volume is assessed by MRI/CT scan at screening, end of cycles (EOC) 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and at the end of treatment. The primary endpoint is spleen volume response rate (SVRR), the proportion of patients in each arm achieving a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline at EOC6, and the key secondary endpoint is MF symptom response rate, the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in total symptom score (TSS) on the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) at EOC6. Other secondary endpoints include durations of spleen volume and symptom responses, reductions in spleen size by palpation, overall and progression-free survival, effectiveness of the risk mitigation strategies for GI AEs and WE, patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include relationships between fedratinib efficacy and prognostic markers (eg, mutations) and pharmacodynamic activity (eg, circulating cytokines, hematopoietic cell profiling). Patients in the BAT arm can cross-over to receive fedratinib after EOC6, or before EOC6 if the patient experiences confirmed progression of splenomegaly. As the first trial to compare fedratinib against other active therapies for MF, results from FREEDOM2 are eagerly anticipated. As of June 2021, 135 patients had been randomized, with enrollment expected to be completed by the end of 2021. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Benevolo: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi: Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison: CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Promedior: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Galacteo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Loschi: CELGENE/BMS: Honoraria; AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Gilead: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Novartis: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; Servier: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Al-Ali: Incyte: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bonifacio: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cervantes: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Wrobel: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian: AbbVie: Consultancy; AOP Orphan: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Verstovsek: PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Ital Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation: Consultancy; Pragmatist: Consultancy. Mesa: Promedior: Research Funding; Pharma: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; AOP: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; La Jolla Pharma: Consultancy; Samus: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Rose: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Gharpure: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Hernandez: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Zhang: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Passamonti: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Mem

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207