Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The ‘husband in a box’ shown here is a visual interpretation of the themes within Iain Reid's book, FOE. It is an ideation of how the replacement spouse would arrive at the home, and the box it arrives in showcases the confines of a marriage that were illustrated in the book. The project also highlights the absurdity of replacing your spouse. The box itself is illustrative of the future and the past, just like the book. The time period is stuck in between the technology of the future, and the values of the past. This is shown through the sleek black colour and futuristic typeface that contrasts with the creamy beige, script font and vintage ad illustrations. Alongside the box is a brochure that would highlight the features of your ‘biomechanical duplicate spouse’. The contrast of new and old is shown again on the cover, and it depicts the couple twice, and each pair has one faceless person with a question mark instead of their facial features. This visual highlights the realistic nature of the replacement and causes the viewer to question which one in the couple is the replacement. It brings forward the frightening thought that you won’t know the difference and may potentially like the replacement better, just as the real Junior did at the end of the novel. Inside the brochure is where the absurd and frightening nature of a replacement spouse really comes to light. The instructions and explanations make it seem as if they are a product you own, not an equal partner in your relationship. The brochure continues on the right side with a description of the models you can get of your replacement husband/wife. As you progress through the models it becomes evident that each one is better than the last. The options become less like your real spouse and become ‘better than the real thing’. The descriptions and features of each model help highlight the dynamics and expectations that can be seen within a marriage. The notion that you can get a better version of your spouse is a frightening proposition that illustrates the inequality that Hen experiences in her marriage. That thought is continued through Juniors return, he expected his wife to snap back into her expected and stereotypical role as his spouse. Her role was not an equal one in their marriage and Junior did not consider the mental hardships she endured while he was gone. Junior only considered his own wants, needs, and expectations. In the end of the novel we can see that Junior didn’t want an equal partner, he wanted a ‘superior spouse’, one that meets all his expectations. But this idea of a perfect spouse can’t be found in a person, but it can be found in a product.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,289 | 0,103 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».