Genomic and Transcriptional Characterization of Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell Lymphoma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype that occurs predominantly in young adults, with an overall favorable prognosis. The cell of origin is presumed to be thymic medullary B-cells and the gene expression profile of PMBL is similar to classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Recent studies have begun unravelling the genomic alterations underlying PMBL. Frequent, recurrent mutations (e.g. B2M, TNFAIP3, SOCS1, STAT6, GNA13) have been reported, but most of the studies have analyzed a small number of cases. To gain further insights into disease biology, we recruited 63 cases of PMBL as part of the Atlas of Blood Cancer Genomes (ABC-G) initiative, a consortium consisting of 25 institutions. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies and clinical data were collected. All cases were subjected to centralized review by an experienced panel of hematopathologists to ensure accurate diagnosis. Whole-exome DNA and RNA sequencing was performed using the Illumina platform and the DNA and RNA reads aligned to the GRCh38 genome and transcriptome respectively. Exonic variants were filtered using a set of paired normal samples and population-based databases to identify putative driver mutations, which were then aggregated at the gene level. Mutational analysis was performed on 56 samples that passed quality filtering and expression analysis on 45 samples. RNAseq data was normalized using DESeq2. Results: The cohort included samples from 16 males and 24 females, with a median age of 33 years (range 16 - 72) at the time of diagnosis. The majority of patients were treated with R-CHOP (47%) or R-EPOCH (43%), with 93% of patients surviving through the end of follow-up (median follow-up: 60.1 months). Besides the known recurrent mutations involving the JAK-STAT (STAT6 -21%, SOCS1 - 26%), NFKB (TNFAIP3 - 27%, NFKB1A - 7%), immune escape (B2M - 20%, LTB - 11%, IRF8 - 9%, IRF4 -9%), and chromatin modification (ZNF217 - 16%, CREBBP - 11%, KMT2D -11%) pathways , we discovered recurrent somatic variants in novel candidate driver genes in this disease, including NOTCH4 (7%), DICER1 (11%), MCL1 (7%), amongst others. EZH2, EP300, and XPO1 mutations were not detected. CIITA mutations and fusions were observed in 14% and 11% of cases, respectively, with novel partner genes (IGHA2, IGHG1, CDC6) detected in 67% of the fusion positive cases. Copy number alterations included gains at 2p16.1 (REL - 20%) and 9p24.2 (JAK2/PDL1/PDL2 - 24%), as well as loci not previously implicated in PMBL, 8q24.3 and 9q34.3 (each in 20%). Of note, CIITA alterations and 9p24 gains were virtually mutually exclusive, highlighting diverse mechanisms of immune escape in this entity. The transcriptomes of cases harboring CIITA alterations demonstrated differential enrichment of genes involved in protein glycosylation. The PMBLs in our series showed significant enrichment of the reported PMBL genetic classifier score, compared to nodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (p=0.0003). Finally, the gene expression profile of thymic B cells was more similar to that of PMBL than nodal DLBCL (p=0.0144). Conclusions: Our study, representing one of the largest comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analyses of PMBL, expands the mutational landscape of PMBL, provides evidence for biologically distinct disease subsets and suggests an origin of PMBLs from thymic B-cells. Disclosures Hsi: AbbVie: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Cytomx: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. McKinney: BTG: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy; Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Molecular Templates: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Jaye: Stemline Therapeutics: Honoraria. Cohen: Genentech, Takeda, BMS/Celgene, BioInvent, LAM, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Loxo/Lilly: Research Funding; Janssen, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BeiGene, Cellectar, Adicet, Loxo/Lilly, AStra ZenecaKite/Gilead: Consultancy. Behdad: Lilly: Speakers Bureau; Roche/Foundation Medicine: Speakers Bureau; Thermo Fisher: Speakers Bureau. Dave: Data Driven Bioscience: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».