MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3212171289 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-147881

Five-Year Follow-up of Keynote-087: Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL)

2021· article· en· W3212171289 sur OpenAlexaff
Philippe Armand, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Hun Ju Lee, Nathalie A. Johnson, Pauline Brice, John Radford, Vincent Ribrag, Daniel Molin, Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos, Akihiro Tomita, Bastian von Tresckow, Margaret A. Shipp, Alex F. Herrera, Jianxin Lin, Eunhee Kim, Samhita Chakraborty, Patricia Marinello, Craig H. Moskowitz

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClassical Hodgkin lymphomaPembrolizumabMedicineRefractory (planetary science)Internal medicineOncologyLymphomaGastroenterologyHodgkin lymphomaCancerImmunotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Prognosis remains poor for patients (pts) with R/R cHL who relapse after or are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are an effective therapeutic option for such pts. Previous analyses from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-087 (NCT02453594) trial demonstrated that monotherapy with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (pembro) had effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety in pts with R/R cHL, leading to FDA approval for adult and pediatric pts with R/R cHL who relapsed after ≥3 prior lines of therapy. However, durability of response after pembro, its relationship with response depth, and safety of treatment discontinuation for pts achieving complete response (CR) remain salient clinical questions. We present efficacy and safety from KEYNOTE-087 after ~5 y of follow-up. Methods: Pts with R/R cHL that progressed after ASCT and subsequent brentuximab vedotin (BV, cohort 1), progressive disease (PD) after salvage chemotherapy and BV therapy without ASCT (cohort 2), or PD after ASCT without subsequent BV therapy (cohort 3) received pembro 200 mg every 3 wks for up to 2 y. Pts who discontinued treatment after initial CR and relapsed were eligible to receive up to 17 additional cycles (~1 y) of pembro (2nd course). Primary end points: ORR per blinded independent central review (BICR), and safety. Additional end points: ORR per Lugano classification, DOR, and PFS by BICR; OS and 2nd-course ORR per investigator. DOR, PFS, and OS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier (K/M) method. Data cutoff was March 15, 2021. Results: At data cutoff, median time from first dose to date of death or data cutoff was 62.9 mo (range, 1.0-68.7). In the total population (N=210), 46 pts completed 2 y of treatment and 164 pts discontinued (primarily due to progressive disease [n=86]). ORR was 71.0% (95% CI, 64.8-77.4; CR, 27.6%; partial response [PR, 43.8%]); results were similar per Lugano classification (ORR, 73.3% [95% CI, 66.8-79.2]; CR, 32.9%; PR, 40.5%). ORR was 84.1% (CR, 36.2%; PR, 47.8%) in cohort 1 (n=69), 67.9% (CR, 28.4%; PR, 39.5%) in cohort 2 (n=81), and 68.3% (CR, 35.0%; PR, 33.3%) in cohort 3 (n=60). In the total population, median DOR was 16.6 mo (95% CI, 11.8-27.1). Four pts (24.8% per K/M method; cohort 1, n=1; cohort 2, n=0; cohort 3, n=3) had response ≥60 mo. In the total population, median PFS was 13.7 mo (95% CI, 11.1-19.4) and the 5-y PFS rate was 14.2%: 16.4 mo (95% CI, 11.3-27.6) in cohort 1, 11.1 mo (95% CI, 7.5-13.7) in cohort 2, and 19.7 mo (95% CI, 10.8-27.3) in cohort 3. In the total population, median OS was not reached (NR) and the 5-y OS rate was 70.7%: 71.3% in cohort 1, 69.2% in cohort 2, and 71.5% in cohort 3. Of 58 pts in the total population who achieved CR (Table), median DOR was NR (95% CI, 16.1-NR) and 4 pts (51.6% per K/M method; cohort 1, n=1; cohort 2, n=0; cohort 3, n=3) had a response ≥60 mo. Median PFS was 56.5 mo (95% CI, 21.7-NR) and 5-y PFS rate was 44.3%; median OS was NR and 5-y OS rate was 82.8%. Ten pts with CR received allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) and 48 pts with CR did not undergo allo-SCT. Of 20 pts who received 2nd-course treatment (cohort 1, n=10; cohort 2, n=7; cohort 3, n=3), 10 pts (cohort 1, n=2; cohort 2, n=6; cohort 3, n=2) completed 17 additional cycles of treatment; 1 pt each from cohort 1 and cohort 3 were mid-treatment. ORR based on 19 evaluable pts from cohorts 1-3 was 73.7% (95% CI, 48.8-90.9). Median DOR for 2nd course was 15.2 mo (95% CI, 3.9-32.9), and 1 pt (13.7%) had a second response ≥36 mo. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 72.9% of pts; most common (>10%) were hypothyroidism (14.3%), pyrexia (11.4%), and fatigue (11.0%). Grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 12.9% of pts; neutropenia (n=5), diarrhea and pericarditis (n=2, each) occurred in ≥2 pts. All-cause grade 5 AEs (n=3) were due to acute graft-versus-host disease, infection, and septic shock; these AEs were not considered treatment related. Conclusions: With median of follow-up >5 y, pembro monotherapy demonstrated sustained antitumor activity in pts with R/R cHL. ORRs were high and responses durable in the overall population and in those with varied treatment histories. Pts with CR had especially durable responses, and in those relapsing from CR, 2nd-course pembro frequently re-induced sustained response. Safety was manageable with no new signals. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Armand: Merck & Co., Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Morphosys: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy; Tessa: Consultancy; GenMab: Consultancy; C4: Consultancy; Enterome: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Sigma Tau: Research Funding; IGM: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding. Zinzani: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ImmuneDesign: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Lee: Oncternal: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seagen: Research Funding; Century Therapeutics: Consultancy; Guidepoint: Honoraria; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Johnson: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Brice: MSD: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Radford: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria. Ribrag: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argen-X: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Research Funding; PharmaMar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Boa

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations23
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207