Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The employment market today is an energetic, vibrant, demanding, challenging and tough place for young individuals graduating from different schools, universities or any educational institutions. Employers expect the graduates they employ to hold specific skills such as logical thinking, quick learning, communication skills, flexibility, ambition, high levels of motivation, creativity, critical thinking, initiative, teamwork and time management (Lester, 2013: 1). Various industries, companies and businesses mainly depend on the output of graduates from the universities, colleges and other higher education institutions who are equipped with the necessary employable skills. This study was therefore conducted to conduct survey and explore the students’ perception on the employability skills needed to be competitive in the market and business world. This study was conducted at the College of Business, Entrepreneurship and Accountancy of Cagayan State University-Andrews Campus, Tuguegarao City where the respondents were the second batch of the Bachelor of Science in Accounting Technology. The respondents of this study were the 113 4th year BSAT students for the School Year 2017–2018. Total enumeration was used by the researcher in obtaining the results. The survey questionnaire used was patterned from the employability skills profile developed by members of The Conference Board of Canada's Employability Skills Forum and the Business and Education Forum on Science, Technology, and Mathematics. The data gathered were tabulated, analyzed and interpreted using the descriptive statistics like rank and weighted mean. Descriptive method was used to come up with a good result of the study. Result of the study revealed that under the fundamental skills, managing information and working with tools and technology got the highest category mean of 4.14, followed by communicating with a category mean of 4.09 and thinking and problem solving with a category mean of 3.99. With regard to personal management skills, learning continuously got the highest mean of 4.28 followed by self-management and being adaptable, next is demonstrating positive attitudes and behaviours and finally initiative and enterprise with a category mean of 4.13, 4.12 and 3.92 respectively. While under the teamwork skills participating in projects and tasks got 4.08 and working with others got 4.05 category mean. From the results generated it is therefore recommended that the college should design authentic assessment activities, aligned with industry practices, standards and approaches and that employers should work together with schools to provide learning experiences that will promote students’ development of employability skills.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».