MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3213141384 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-148881

SCRI-CAR19x22v2 T Cell Product Demonstrates Bispecific Activity in B-ALL

2021· article· en· W3213141384 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Colleen Annesley, Corinne Summers, Michael A. Pulsipher, Jodi Skiles, Amanda M. Li, Anant Vatsayan, Catherine Lindgren, Stephanie Mgebroff, Ashley Wilson, Wenjun Huang, Qian Wu, Joshua D. Gustafson, Christopher Brown, Michael C. Jensen, Julie R. Park, Rebecca Gardner

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCD22CD19AntigenPopulationMedicineImmunologyChimeric antigen receptorT cellBiologyImmune system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: CAR T cells in B-ALL have recently focused on the dual targeting of CD19 and CD22 to enhance long term remissions and prevent antigen negative recurrence that is frequently encountered with single antigen targeting. However, a barrier to this approach has been the retention of dual specificity killing and ongoing persistence. PLAT-05 is a multisite phase 1 trial (NCT03330691) that was undertaken to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SCRI-CAR19x22v1, a dual transduced patient-derived product with lentiviral vectors encoding for either a CD19- or CD22-specific CAR, both with 4-1BB co-stimulation. Early results of the first 27 subjects infused demonstrated feasibility and a favorable safety profile with encouraging CR rates. Products were fractionated evenly between CD19 CAR, CD19+CD22 CAR and CD22 CAR. However, engraftment was predominated by the single CD19 CAR population, leading to unsuccessful eradication of CD19-CD22+ leukemia. This finding led to re-engineering the CD22 CAR construct for enhanced CD22 targeting, and re-initiation of dose finding with the new product, SCRI-CAR19v2. Methods: After enrollment, subjects undergo apheresis followed by a combined CD4/CD8 positive immunomagnetic selection and seeded at a prescribed ratio for co-culture in a closed-system G-Rex bioreactor. Following anti-CD3xCD28 bead stimulation, T cells are transduced with two lentiviral vectors that encode for either a CD19- or CD22-specific CAR. After flu/cy lymphodepletion, CAR T cells are infused at one of three dose levels: 0.5, 1 or 3 X 10 6 CAR T cells/kg. Toxicity is graded according to CTCAEv5 except for CRS and ICANS which are graded per ASTCT criteria. Leukemic response and CAR T cell persistence are evaluated by flow cytometry. Results: 14 subjects enrolled onto PLAT-05 for the SCRI-CAR19x22v2 dose escalation and products were successfully manufactured in all subjects with an average of 8.9 days in culture (range 7-12 days). In contrast to v1 products, the CAR composition of v2 products was skewed in favor of CD22 CAR expression, with median expression of each population as follows: 42% CD22 only, 33% CD19 and CD22, 3.2% CD19 only. Twelve subjects were infused (0.5x10 6/kg n=3, 1x10 6/kg n=3, 3x10 6/kg n=6), 11 of whom had prior exposure to CD19 or CD22 targeted therapies with diverse expression of CD19 and CD22 on the leukemic blasts. No dose limiting toxicities occurred in the 11 fully evaluable subjects (1 subject is pending) and the recommended phase 2 dose was determined as 3x10 6 CAR + cells/kg. CRS was present in 45% of subjects, all grade 1. Neurotoxicity occurred in 45% of subjects, all grade 1 except a single self-limited grade 3 ICANS event (due to a single time point CAPD score). 91% of infused subjects obtained a CR, of which 100% were MRD negative. The non-responder had persistent disease that was CD19-CD22-. The in vivo engraftment of CAR T cells peaked most frequently between day +7 and +14 and was predominated by the CD22 CAR T cells, with some minimal contribution of dual and CD19 CAR T cells. Of the 4 subjects who had previously received an FMC63 based CD19 CAR, expansion was due to solely to the CD22 CARs in all 4 subjects, with apparent rejection of the T cells expressing CD19 CAR. Conclusions: We demonstrate enhanced activity of SCRI-CAR19x22v2 compared to v1, now with dual activity against both CD19 and CD22 demonstrated by elimination of ALL with single antigen expression. We maintained encouraging CR rates with a favorable toxicity profile. Interestingly, the product is predominated by CD22 CAR and CD19/CD22 CAR populations, while in vivo engraftment is predominated by single CD22 CAR expressing T cells. Subjects exposed to prior CD19 murine based CAR rejected the CD19 CAR but engrafted the CD22 CAR with demonstratable activity, a potential advantage of a dual transduced product. The impact of lower CD19 CAR engraftment on durable remissions is unknown. While limited expansion of the CD19 CAR population could be protective against exhaustion, the uneven engraftment of the CAR populations may ultimately lead to single antigen targeting. Optimization of transduction may be required for a more balanced product to maintain dual targeting and give further insight into the behavior of dual-expressing CAR T cells. An expansion cohort is currently underway to further characterize engraftment kinetics and in vivo performance to best inform future development of this product. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pulsipher: Jasper Therapeutics: Honoraria; Adaptive: Research Funding; Equillium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Li: Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jensen: Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Umoja Biopharma: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Patents & Royalties. Gardner: Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Patents & Royalties. OffLabel Disclosure: investigational use of SCRI-CAR19x22 will be discussed

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations20
Publié2021
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207