First Report of Halo Blight of Hop (<i>Humulus lupulus</i>) Caused by <i>Diaporthe humulicola</i> in Quebec, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Halo blight of hop caused by Diaporthe humulicola has recently been reported in Michigan and Connecticut (Higgins et al. 2021, Allan-Perkins et al 2020). In August 2020 growers in Quebec, Canada reported necrotic foliar lesions and desiccation of the hop strobile (cone) on Chinook and Nugget cultivars. The foliar lesions were dry concentric circles with a chlorotic halo surrounding the lesions; no pycnidia were observed on leaves or cones. Up to 100% of the infected bract tissue was dry and easily shattered, the grower estimated that more than 90% of the plants in the hopyard exhibited symptoms. Twenty-six isolates were obtained from surface-sterilized leaf and cone tissue by plating the leading edge of lesions on potato dextrose agar. Fungal isolates were hyphal tipped and were incubated at 22°C with a 12 h photoperiod. After 21-days, all cultures were white to beige with pycnidia. DNA was extracted from cultures using the MagMAX Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). DNA amplification of a representative isolate (CD6C) was performed with primers ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990) for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), CYLH3F/H3-1b (Glass and Donaldson 1995) for histone 3 (HIS), and Ef1728f/EF1-986R (Carbone and Kohn 1999) for translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF). Amplification primers were used for bidirectional Sanger sequencing, reads were assembled using Geneious Prime (Biomatters, New Zealand), and identified using NCBI BLAST. BLAST results showed that the sequences for TEF, ITS, and HIS all had 100% pairwise identity to Diaporthe sp. 1-MI (MT909101, MT909099, MT909093, OK001342, MZ934713, OK001341). Futhermore, BLAST results showed that ITS and HIS have 100% pairwise identity D. humulicola (MN152929, MN180214). The TEF sequence also had 99.7% pairwise identity to D. humulicola (MN180209). Koch's postulates were conducted by inoculating six 3-mo-old 'Chinook' plants with conidia harvested from 28-day-old cultures and spraying 50 ml of inoculum (6 x 105 conidia/ml) or water to each plant. Plants were then stored in a greenhouse at 100% relative humidity at 22°C with a 14-h photo period. Lesions appeared on the adaxial side of the leaf after 21 days. D. humulicola was re-isolated from all infected leaf tissue, but not from any water inoculated plants and identified by conidial morphology using descriptions from Higgins et al. (2021). So far, Diaporthe sp. 1-MI appears to be synonymous with Diaporthe humulicola, but currently two names are being utilized (i.e. Diaporthe leaf spot and halo blight). In Higgins et al., (2021) it was proposed that the name halo blight might be more appropriate because disease symptoms are not confined to the leaves and cause significant blighting of cones. Halo blight caused by D. humulicola appears widespread in Michigan and Canada and may become an issue in other eastern North American growing regions with humid conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».